Hill Publishing Group | contact@hillpublisher.com

Hill Publishing Group

Location:Home / Journals / International Journal of Food Science and Agriculture /


Influence of Crossbreeding of Sasso and Faso Chickens on Some Hatching Events and Post-Hatch Performances

Date: June 24,2022 |Hits: 2140 Download PDF How to cite this paper

A. Bilalissi1,2,*, Y. Lombo1, K. A. Kossoga1, K. Tona1, B. B. Batimsoga1, K. Voemesse1, T. P. Tare1, B. Bagna1, O. E. Oke3

1Institut Togolais de Recherche Agronomique (ITRA), Agoe Cacaveli, BP 1163 Lome, Togo.

2Laboratory of Poultry Science, Regional Center of Excellenceon Poultry Science (CERSA), University of Lome (Togo), BP 1515, Lome, Togo.

3Department of Animal Physiology, Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria.

*Corresponding author: A. Bilalissi


The impact of crossbreeding between exotic and selected indigenous chickens on growth performances is well-documented. However, there is a scarcity of data on the hatching events of the progenies. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of a cross between Sasso and Faso chickens on hatching events and post-hatching performance. A total of 360 hens from the Sasso breeders’ hens (200) and Faso hens (160) strains were assigned to 12 individual breeding pens with 30 hens per pen (6 replicates per group). The mating ratio was 1:10. The crosses were: Sasso x Sasso (SS), Faso x Faso (FF) and Faso x Sasso (FS), with roosters of the alternative strain to obtain crossbred. 1,200 hatching eggs (400 eggs/crossing group) were studied. Before the start of incubation, each egg was numbered and weighed. The eggs were set incubated using 37.8°C and 60% relative humidity. At d 18 of incubation, eggs were candled according to genotypes and those with evidence of living embryos were transferred from the turning trays to hatcher baskets. Between 455 and 510 h of incubation, the transferred eggs were checked every 3h for hatching events. After hatching at 21.5d, chickens were reared for 12 weeks. During this period, body weights, feed intake and mortality were recorded. The results indicated that the initial egg weights and one-day-old chick weights from the FS group were significantly higher (p<0.0001) compared to the FF group but the SS group recorded the highest egg weight and day-old chick weight. The fertility and hatchability were significantly higher (p<0.0001) in the SS group followed by the FS group and F group. Crossbreeding did not impact external and total incubation duration but Faso embryos pipped earlier (p=0.0267) than both Sasso and crossbred embryos. Feed intake, body weight, body weight gain and feed conversion ratio were significantly (p<0.05) improved in the crossbred compared to Faso indigenous chicken. The mortality rate was significantly higher (p=0.0005) in the SS group compared to FS and FF groups. It can be concluded that there is a higher genetic variation in Sasso and Faso genotypes and this variation resulted in higher growth performances for crossbred chickens.


[1] Sørensen, P. (2010). Chicken genetic resources used in smallholder production systems and opportunities for their development. FAO Smallholder Poultry Production Paper No. 5. Rome.

[2] Khalil, M. K., Al-Homidan, A. H., and Hermes, I. H. (2004). Crossbreeding components in age at first egg and egg production for crossing Saudi chickens with White Leghorn. Livest. Res. for Rural Develop, 16(1): 10. 

[3] Yalcin, S., Zhang, X., McDaniel, G. R., Kuhlers, D. L. (2000). Effects of divergent selection for incidence of tibial dyschondroplasia (TD) on purebred and crossbred performance. 2. Processing yield. Journal of British Poultry Science, 41(5): 566-569.

[4] Aly, M. A., Ella, E., and Abou, N. Y. (2006). Effect of crossing on the performance of local strains 2. estimates of pure line difference, direct Heterosis, maternal additive and direct additive effect for growth traits, viability and some carcass traits. Egypt. J. Poult. Sci., 26: 53-67.

[5] Nawar, M. E., Aly, O. M., and Abd El-Hamid, A. E. (2004). The effect of crossing on some economic traits in chickens. Egypt. Poult. Sci. J., 24: 163-176.

[6] Tabinda, K., Khan, S. H., Mukhtar, N., Parveen, A., Ahmed, T. (2013). Comparative study of growth performance, meat quality and haematological parameters of three-way crossbred chickens with reciprocal F1 crossbred chickens in a subtropical en-vironment. Journal of Applied Animal Resource, 41(3): 300-308. 

[7] Rahman, M., Sorensen, P., Jensen, H. A., Dolberg, F. (1997). Exotic hens under semi scavenging conditions in Bangladesh. Livestock Resources for Rural Development, 9(3): 1-11.

[8] Permin, A. (2009). Good practices in small scale poultry production. A Manual for Trainers and Producers in East Africa FAO.

[9] Saadey, S. M., Galal, A., Zaky, H. I., El-Dein, A. Z. (2008). Diallel crossing analysis for body weight and egg production traits of two native Egyptian and two exotic chicken breeds. International Journal of Poultry Science, 7(1): 64-71.

[10] Bilalissi, A., Meteyake, H. T., Kouame, Y. A. E., Oke, O. E., Lin, H., Onagbesan, O., Decuypere, E., and Tona, K. (2022). Effects of pre-incubation storage duration and nonventilation incubation procedure on embryonic physiology and post-hatch chick performance. Poultry science, 101, no. 5: 101810. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2022.101810.

[11] Tona, K., Bamelis, F., De Ketelaere, B., Bruggeman, V., Moreas, V. M. B., Buyse, J., Onagbesan, O., Decuypere, E. (2003). Effects of egg storage time on spread of hatch, chick quality, and chick juvenile growth. Poult. Sci., 2003, 82: 736-741.

[12] Halima, H., Neser, F. W. C., De Kock, A., and Marle-Köster, E. V. (2006). Growth performance of indigenous chickens under intensive management conditions in Northwest Ethiopia. S. Afr. J. of Anim. Sci., 36 (5): 71-73.

[13] Keambou, T. C., Mboumba, S., Touko, B. A. H., Bembide, C., Mezui, T. M., Tedongmo, A. M. Y., and Manjeli, Y. (2015). Growth performances, carcass and egg characteristics of the local chicken and its first generation reciprocal crossbreds with an exotic strain in Cameroon. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci., 3(10): 507-513.

[14] Teketel, F. (1986). Studies on the meat production potential of some local strains of chicken in Ethiopia. PhD Thesis. Justus Liebig Giessen University.

[15] Mbajiorgu, C. A. (2011). Effect of hatching egg size on hatchability and chick hatch-weight of indigenous Venda chickens. Ind. J. of Anim. Res., 45(4): 300-304.

[16] De Smit, L., Bruggeman, V., Tona, J. K., Debonne, M., Onagbesan, O., Arckens, L., De Baerdemaeker, J., Decuypere, E. (2006). Embryonic developmental plasticity of the chick: Increased CO2 during early stages of incubation changes the developmental trajectories during prenatal and postnatal growth. Comp. Bioch., Physio. Part A: Mol. and Integr. Physio., 145(2): 166-175.

[17] Taha, A. E., El-Ghany, F. A. A., and Sharaf, M. M. (2011). Strain and sex effects on productive and slaughter performance of local Egyptian and Canadian chicken strains. World’s Poultry Resource Journal, 1: 11-17.

[18] Olawumi, S. O. and Fagbuaro, S. S. (2011). Productive performance of three commercial broiler genotypes reared in the derived savannah zone of Nigeria. Int. J. of Agr. Res., 6 (11): 798-804.

[19] Wondmeneh, E. (2015). Genetic improvement in indigenous chicken of Ethiopia. PhD Thesis, Wageningen University.

[20] Binda, B. D., Yousif, I. A., Elamin, K. M. and Eltayeb, H. E. (2012). A comparison of performance among exotic meat strains and local chicken ecotypes under Sudan conditions. Int. J. of Poult. Sci., 11(8): 500-508.

[21] Munisi, W. G., Katule, A. M., and Mbaga, S. H. (2015). Comparative growth and livability performance of exotic, indigenous chickens and their crosses in Tanzania. Livest. Res. for Rural Develop., 27(2): 66-72.

[22] Tadelle, D., Kijora, C., and Peters, K. J. (2003). Indigenous chicken ecotypes in Ethiopia: growth and feed utilization potentials. Int. J. of Poult. Sci., 2(2): 144-152.

[23] Aengwanich, W. (2007). Effects of high environmental temperature on the productive performance of Thai indigenous, Thai indigenous crossbred and broiler chickens. Int. J. of Poult. Sci., 6(5): 349-353.

[24] Iraqi, M. M., Khalil, M. H., and El-Attrouny, M. M. (2013). Estimation of crossbreeding components for growth traits in crossing Golden Montazah with White Leghorn chickens. VIth Int. Conf. BalnimalconTekirdag/TURKIYE.

[25] Padhi, M. K., Ahlawat, S. P. S., Senani, S., Saha, S. K., and Rai, R. B. (2001). Comparative production performance of Black Nicobari, White Nicobari, synthetic broiler and their crossbreds. Ind. J. of Anim. Sci., 71(11): 1073-1074.

[26] Cruz, F. L., Saraiva, L. K. V., Silva, G. E., Nogueira, T. M., Silva, A. P., and Faria, P. B. (2018). Growth and carcass characteristics of different crosses of broiler chickens reared under an alternative system. J. of CiênciasAgrárias., 9(1): 317-328.

[27] Iraqi, M. M., Afifi, E. A., Abdel-Ghany, A. M., and Afram, M. (2005). Diallel crossing analysis for livability data involving two standard and two native Egyptian chicken breeds. Livest. Res. for Rural Develop., 17(7): 2005.

How to cite this paper

Influence of Crossbreeding of Sasso and Faso Chickens on Some Hatching Events and Post-Hatch Performances

How to cite this paper: A. Bilalissi, Y. Lombo, K. A. Kossoga, K. Tona, B. B. Batimsoga, K. Voemesse, T. P. Tare, B. Bagna, O. E. Oke. (2022) Influence of Crossbreeding of Sasso and Faso Chickens on Some Hatching Events and Post-Hatch Performances. International Journal of Food Science and Agriculture6(2), 228-236.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/ijfsa.2022.06.013

Volumes & Issues

Free HPG Newsletters

Add your e-mail address to receive free newsletters from Hill Publishing Group.

Contact us

Hill Publishing Group

8825 53rd Ave

Elmhurst, NY 11373, USA

E-mail: contact@hillpublisher.com

Copyright © 2019 Hill Publishing Group Inc. All Rights Reserved.