Investigating Prompt Effects on Large Language Model Translation Behaviour in Literary Texts: Evidence from Luotuo Xiangzi

Keyword

Beijing-style literary translation; large language models; prompt engineering; initial translation quality; human–AI collaborative translation

References

Bu, Z. L. (Ed.). (2004). History of modern Chinese literature. Wuhan University Press.

Gao, Y., Wang, R. L., & Hou, F. (2023). How to design translation prompts for ChatGPT: An empirical study. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.02182

Ge, S., & Wang, N. (2024). Literary translation in the era of artificial intelligence: Challenges and opportunities. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching, (1), 94-101+149-150.

Geng, F., & Hu, J. (2023). New direction for post-editing by artificial intelligence translation: A case study of ChatGPT translation. Foreign Languages in China, 20(3), 41-47.

Han, H. J., & Jiang, Y. (2016). A corpus-based comparison of general language features of human translation and online machine translation. Foreign Language Education, 37(5), 102-106.

Han, Z. M., & Chai, T. D. (2024). Knowledge translation competence of artificial intelligence: A case study of literary anecdotes. Technology Enhanced Foreign Language Education, (5), 3-10+105.

Karpinska, M., & Iyyer, M. (2023). Large language models effectively leverage document-level context for literary translation, but critical errors persist. In Proceedings of the eighth conference on machine translation (pp. 419-451). Association for Computational Linguistics.

Li, F. Q. (2022). A comparative study on the quality of English-Chinese translation between translation learners and a machine translation system in the era of artificial intelligence. Foreign Language World, (4), 72-79.

Li, F. Q., Zhang, Y., & Ding, L. J. (2025). C-E legal translation quality comparison: Large language models vs. neural machine translation systems. Shanghai Journal of Translators, (6), 62-67.

Li, Y. F., Yin, Y. J., Li, J., et al. (2022). Prompt-driven neural machine translation. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2022 (pp. 2759-2790). Association for Computational Linguistics.

Velásquez-Henao, J. D., Franco-Cardona, C. J., & Cadavid-Higuita, L. (2023). Prompt engineering: A methodology for optimizing interactions with AI-language models in the field of engineering. DYNA, 90(230), 9-17.

Wang, J. Q., & Wen, Q. F. (2010). Review and implications of the existing automated scoring system—From the perspective of the computer-assisted scoring model of Chinese EFL learners' translation. Foreign Language World, (1), 75-81+91.

Wang, J. S., Zhuang, C. X., & Wei, Y. P. (2024). Machine translation quality assessment: Methods, applications, and outlook. Foreign Languages and Literature, (3), 135-144.

Wen, X., & Tian, Y. L. (2024). The effectiveness of ChatGPT in translating China-specific discourse text. Shanghai Journal of Translators, 40(2), 27-34+94-95.

Wu, M. H., Xu, J. H., Yuan, Y. L., et al. (2025). (Perhaps) beyond human translation: Harnessing multi-agent collaboration for translating ultra-long literary texts. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 13, 901-922.

Wu, Y. J., & Hu, G. (2023). Exploring prompt engineering with GPT language models for document-level machine translation: Insights and findings. In Proceedings of the eighth conference on machine translation (pp. 166-169). Asso-ciation for Computational Linguistics.

Yu, L. (2024). Lexical diversity and syntactic complexity in ChatGPT translation. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 56(2), 297-307+321.

Zhang, S. K., & Zhao, C. Y. (2025). Examining the suitability of large language models for literary translation: A multi-indicator assessment of the English translations of Biancheng. Foreign Languages in China, 22(4), 85-95.

Zhao, Y., Zhang, H., & Yang, Y. C. (2024). Comparative study on the translation quality of large language models—Taking the translation of "Fan Hua" as an example. Technology Enhanced Foreign Language Education, (4), 60-66+109.

Zhu, Y. F., & Zhang, J. D. (2025). Human and machine translation styles in the English versions of The Three-Body Problem: A comparative analysis of Ken Liu, GPT-4, and VolcTrans. Technology Enhanced Foreign Language Education, (4), 88-96+113.

Copyright

© 2026 by the author(s).
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) license, which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not modified or adapted.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/