Hill Publishing Group | contact@hillpublisher.com

Hill Publishing Group

Location:Home / Journals / International Journal of Food Science and Agriculture /

DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/ijfsa.2021.09.015

Investigation and Value of Qualitative and Quantitative Characteristics 10 of Genotypes of Figs

Date: August 17,2021 |Hits: 604 Download PDF How to cite this paper

Tatjana Kokaj

1Gene Bank, Institute of Plant Genetic Resource, Agriculture University of Tirana, Albania. 

2Rruga Siri Kodra, 131/1 Tirane, Albania.

*Corresponding author: Tatjana Kokaj

Abstract

The study was carried out using the germplasm of fig trees from the national collection at the Agriculture University of Tirana. The collection contains several varieties of fig collected from different areas for purposes of conservation and preventing further genepool depletion. 10 genotypes of fig were analysed for quantitative and qualitative characteristics. All genotypes express especially dominant traits such is: colour of fruit, internal colour of fruit, lenticels, taste of fruit, cavity of fruit, length of fruit, form of fruit, form of leaves, type of leaves, genetic traits. This study are analyses quantitave traits such as: weight fruit, weight of tree/fig, Weight is variable parameter and depend on the age of fig tree, growth of tree, variety of the fig tree as well as adaptions of land and climatic condition because varieties have different origin. At all varieties are adapted to soil and climatic condition due to varieties having different origins. All examined varieties, are well adapted to soil and climatic in climatic condition. For varieties which are with maturity of times weight of fig tree is different, in the first maturity of fruit fig weight is a big than second maturity of fig tree weight. There are the less beffer fig trees than uniffer figs. Dominant uniffer varieties mature in August-September. However, last year we analyses with method: Reference AOAC 934.06, Sugar 21.73 2018, 2019; acidity was analyses AOAC 942.15 g/l All parameters were analyses statistical.

References

[1] Aksoy, U., Seferoglu, G., Misirli, A., Kara, S., Sahin, N., Bulbul, S., and Duzbastilar, M. (1992). Selection of the table fig genotypes suitable for Egean Region. I. Paper presented at: Proceeding of the First National Hortic Congress (in Turkish).

[2] Flaishman, A., Rodov, V., and Stover, E. (2008). The fig botany horticulture and breeding, Hortic. Rev (Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci), 34, 113-197. 

[3] Flaishman, M. A. and Al Hadi, F. A. (2002). Fig growth in Israel. Halon Hanotea, 56-57. 

[4] Ferrara, E. and Papa, G. (2003). Evaluation of fig cultivars for Breba crop. Acta Hortic, 605, 91-93.

[5] Gholami, M., Rahemi, M., Kholdebarin, B., and Rastegar, S. (2012). Biochimical responses in leaves of four fig cultivars subjected to water stress and recovery. Sci Hortic (Amsterdam), 143, 7-14.

[6] Hartman, H. T., Kester, D. E., Davies, F. T. Junior, and Geneve, R. L. (2002). Plant Propagation: Principles and Practices, 7 (New Jersey: Prentice Hall), p. 880.

[7] Javanmard, M., Abdolahi Pour Haghighi, J., and Zare, H. (2012). Mulching impact on plant growth and production of rainfed fig orchards under drought conditions. J. Food Agric. Environ., 10(1), 428-433. 

[8] Kai, M., Fen, I. Z., Fen, T. Y., and Weibing, J. (1997). The green cutting propagation techniques for fig trees. China Fruits, 3, 32-38.

[9] Lianju, W., Weibin, J., Kai, M., Zhifeng, L., and Yelin, W. (2003). The production and research of fig (Ficus carica L) in China. Acta Hortic, 24, 44-50. 

[10] M. Aradhya, J. E. Preece, and D. Velasco. (2017). Multivariate analysis of molecular and morphological diversity in Fig (Ficus carica L.). ActaHort, 1173, 23-28.

[11] Mowry, H. (1925). Growing fig in Florida. Prc, Fla. State Hort, Soc, 38, 92-97. 

[12] Melgas, P. (2000). Tradato de Fruticultura para Zonas Aridas y Semiaridas El Medio Ecologico, la Higuera el Alcaparro y el Nopal (Madrit, Spain: S.AMundi-Prensa), p. 375. 

[13] O. Caliscan, S. Bayazit, M. Ilgin, N. Karatas, and H. Kocatas. (2017). Preliminary results on morpho-pomologichal traits and pollinizer characterization of some caprifig genotypes grown in Eastern Mediterranean region of Turkey. Acta Horticulturae, 1173, 45-48.

[14] R. Mafrica, A. Marchese, M. Bruno, F. Costa, S. Fretto, F. P. Marra, S. Pangallo, A. Quartararo, and T. Caruso. Morphological and molecular variability within the fig cultivar “Dottato” in the Italian protected designation origin area “Fichi di Cosenza”.

[15] Rossello I Botei, J. (2007). Characteritzacio de cultivars de Figuera a Mallorca (ED Govern de les Illes Balears, Conselleria dAgricultura I Pesca), p. 175.

[16] Stover, E., Aradhya, M., Ferguson, L., and Cris. The fig overview of an ancient fruit. Hortscience 42, 1083.

[17] Trad, M. C., Galiche, B., Renard, C. M. G. C., and Ferguson, L. (2013). Plant natural resources and fruit characteristics of fig (Ficus carica L) change from coastal to continental areas of Tunisia. E3 Journal of Agricultural Research and Development, 3, 22-25. 

[18] Zorba, P. (2019). Buletini klimatik, 2019.

How to cite this paper

Investigation and Value of Qualitative and Quantitative Characteristics 10 of Genotypes of Figs

How to cite this paper: Tatjana Kokaj. (2021) Investigation and Value of Qualitative and Quantitative Characteristics 10 of Genotypes of Figs. International Journal of Food Science and Agriculture5(3), 448-454.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/ijfsa.2021.09.015

Volumes & Issues

Free HPG Newsletters

Add your e-mail address to receive free newsletters from Hill Publishing Group.

Contact us

Hill Publishing Group

8825 53rd Ave

Elmhurst, NY 11373, USA

E-mail: contact@hillpublisher.com

Copyright © 2019 Hill Publishing Group Inc. All Rights Reserved.