magazinelogo

International Journal of Law and Social Justice

ISSN Online: 3070-6157 CODEN:
Frequency: Quarterly Email: IJLSJ@hillpublish.com
Total View: 174824 Downloads: 41729 Citations: 0 (From Dimensions)
ArticleOpen Access http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/ijlsj.2026.06.005

Beyond the Text: How the Supreme Court Breathed New Life into Right to Life Under Article 21

Rajib Hassan

Government of West Bengal, Nabanna 711102, India.

*Corresponding author: Rajib Hassan

Published: June 30, 2026

Abstract

During the British regime in India, human rights were widely violated by the rulers. Therefore, the framers of the Constitution, most of whom suffered long incarceration under the British, had a very positive attitude towards these rights. Accordingly, human rights were incorporated in the Constitution under the title of ‘Fundamental Rights’ in Part III, Articles 12-35. In his closing address to the Constituent Assembly, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar emphasized that the principle of liberty, equality and fraternity were not to be treated as separate entities but as a trinity. They formed the union or trinity in the sense that to divorce one from another was to defeat the very purpose of democracy. Liberty could not be divorced from equality. Equality could not be divorced from liberty. Nor could equality and liberty be divorced from fraternity.…. Accordingly, the Constitution puts due emphasis on equality, fraternity and liberty. As the protector and guardian of fun-damental rights, from the very beginning the Supreme Court has adopted the state that it acts as the ‘sentinel on the qui vive’ vis a vis fundamental rights and has stressed this role in several cases.

Keyword

Article 21; Right to Life; Personal Liberty; Procedure Established by Law; Supreme Court as the Guardian of Fundamental Rights; “sentinel on the qui vive”

References

Hansaria, B. L. (1993). Right to life and liberty under the constitution. N. M. Tripathi Pvt. Ltd. (p. 22).

Hansaria, B. L. (1993). Right to life and liberty under the constitution. N. M. Tripathi Pvt. Ltd. (p. 19).

M. C. Mehta v. Union of India. (1986). SCC, 2, 176.

Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India. (1978). AIR, 1978 SC, 597.

Subba Rao, K. (1970). Some constitutional problems. (p. 115).

Verma, S. K., & Kusum. (n.d.). Fifty years of the Supreme Court of India: Its grasp and reach. Oxford University Press. (p. 22).

Pandey, J. N. (2011). The constitutional law of India (48th ed.). Central Law Agency. (p. 252).

Copyright

© 2026 by the author(s).
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) license, which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not modified or adapted.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this paper

Beyond the Text: How the Supreme Court Breathed New Life into Right to Life Under Article 21

How to cite this paper: Rajib Hassan. (2026). Beyond the Text: How the Supreme Court Breathed New Life into Right to Life Under Article 21. International Journal of Law and Social Justice2(1), 37-47.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/ijlsj.2026.06.005