magazinelogo

Translation and Foreign Language Learning

ISSN Online: 3069-0315 ISSN Print: 3070-3077 CODEN:
Frequency: monthly Email: tfll@hillpublish.com
Total View: 326912 Downloads: 74482 Citations: 0 (From Dimensions)
ArticleTranslation Theories and Skills http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/tfll.2026.01.004

The Translator as Social Person: Herbert A. Giles’ Utility-oriented Translation of The Old Drunkard’s Arbour

Ziqi Liu*, Hao Liu

School of Interpreting and Translation Studies, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Guangzhou 510420, Guangdong, China.

*Corresponding author: Ziqi Liu

This work was supported by the 2025 Tianjin Philosophy and Social Science Planning Project, Tianjin School of Culture Research Special Topic: Research on the Translation and International Communication Influence En-hancement Strategy of Tianjin School Intangible Cultural Heritage (NO. TJJW01-04).
Published: January 31, 2026

Abstract

In the background of Chinese culture globalization and cultural diversity, revising the translation of classical literature is essential for examining power dynamics and translators’ agency in Sino-Western cultural exchange. This study adopts Zhou Lingshun’s Translator Behavior Criticism theory as its main tool to analyze Herbert A. Giles’s 1922 English translation of The Old Drunkard’s Arbour. This theory defines the translator as an agent dynamically mediating between the roles of “cultural person” (truth-seeking) and “social person” (utility-attaining). Through textual close reading, comparative analysis and historical contextualization, this paper finds that Giles’s translation behavior shows a consistent tendency toward the utility-attaining orientation. In the late Victorian era of colonialism and Orientalism, his translation adopts a thorough domestication strategy aiming to produce a fluent literary piece for English readers. While this strategy functioned successfully in cultural introduction, it inevitably simplified or even dis-placed the distinctive literary specificity and philosophical connotation of the source text. The study argues that translation forms deeply reflects the interaction between power, knowledge and culture in certain historical period. By assessing its contributions and limitations in a historical perspective, this study provides historical reference and reflection for contemporary Chinese classics translation, especially in terms of the dialectical balance between cultural fidelity and reader acceptance.

Keyword

Translator Behavior Criticism; The Old Drunkard’s Arbour; Herbert A. Giles; Translation Criticism; Truth-seeking and Utility-attaining

References

Geng, L., & Wang, S. (2025). A study of Herbert A. Giles’s English translation of Suiyuan Shidan. Chinese Science & Technology Translators Journal, 38(2), 60-62.

Giles, H. A. (1922). Gems of Chinese literature. Bernard Quaritch.

Ma, D., & Zhou, L. (2020). The indigenous construction of translation criticism theory: An interview with Professor Zhou Lingshun. Journal of Beijing International Studies University, 42(1), 57-70.

Wen, X. (2011). A comparative critique of English translations of Ouyang Xiu’s The Old Drunkard’s Arbour. Journal of Hubei Radio & Television University, 31(7), 91.

Xiao, S. (1997). On Ouyang Xiu’s demotion to Chuzhou. Journal of Jinggangshan University (Social Sciences), 18(4), 13-18.

Xu, J., & Zhou, L. (2025). Advancing translator behavior research into depth. Journal of Beijing International Studies University, 47(1), 1-10.

Zhou, L. (2011). Clarifying concepts in the truth-seeking/utility-attaining evaluative model of translator behavior continuum: Translator behavior studies (VII). Journal of Jiangsu University (Social Science Edition), 13(6), 42-49.

Zhou, L. (2016). A study of ‘folk language’ translation and its criticism. Foreign Language Research, 33(4), 77-82.

Zhou, L. (2019). Theoretical issues in translator behavior criticism. Foreign Language and Literature, 35(5), 118-123.

Zhou, L. (2024). An analysis of interaction relations in translator behavior. Foreign Language Research, 41(3), 1-5, 112.

Zhou, L. (2024). On ‘extra-translation’ research in translator behavior criticism: Also a comparison of the intra-/extra-translation analytical framework and the ‘text-behavior-society’ triadic evaluation system. Foreign Languages in China, 21(5), 106-112.

Zhou, L. (2024). Translator behavior criticism theory and its application issues: A response to researchers (part III). Foreign Language and Literature, 40(1), 84-96.

Zhou, L. (2025). A holistic view of translator behavior studies. Shandong Foreign Language Teaching, 46(2), 100-107.

Zhou, L. (2025). Revisiting ‘extra-translation’ research in translator behavior studies. Journal of Beijing International Studies University, 47(2), 31-42.

Zhou, L. (2025). The ‘text-behavior-society’ triadic system in translator behavior studies. Foreign Language and Liter-ature, 41(2), 105-113.

Zhou, L., & Chen, J. (2018). Semantic truth-seeking and contextual utility-attaining. Chinese Translators Journal, 39(5), 116-119.

Zhou, L., & Zhang, S. (2018). A translator behavior criticism analysis of the translator Fang Zhong. Foreign Language and Literature, 34(4), 103-109.

Copyright

© 2026 by the author(s).
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) license, which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not modified or adapted.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this paper

The Translator as Social Person: Herbert A. Giles’ Utility-oriented Translation of The Old Drunkard’s Arbour

How to cite this paper: Ziqi Liu, Hao Liu. (2026). The Translator as Social Person: Herbert A. Giles’ Utility-oriented Translation of The Old Drunkard’s Arbour. Translation and Foreign Language Learning2(1), 21-26.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/tfll.2026.01.004