magazinelogo

OAJRC Material Science

ISSN Online: 2632-2072 CODEN: OMSAAO
Frequency: Instant publication Email: oajrcms@hillpublish.com
Total View: 405461 Downloads: 26493 Citations: 3 (From Dimensions)

Volumes & Issues

Current Issue

All Volumes

ArticleOpen Access http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/oajrcms.2026.06.004

Chemical Bonding and Electronic Structures of Azurite and Malachite by X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy

J. Theo Kloprogge

Department of Chemistry, College of Arts and Sciences, The University of the Philippines Visayas, Miagao, Iloilo 5023, Philippines.

*Corresponding author: J. Theo Kloprogge

Published: June 17, 2026

Abstract

Azurite [Cu₃ (CO₃)₂ (OH)₂] and malachite [Cu₂CO₃(OH)₂] are important basic copper carbonate-hydroxide minerals that serve as historical pigments, archaeological corrosion products, and indicators of geochemical processes in oxidized copper deposits. While Fourier-transform infrared microscopy (FTIR) and Raman spectroscopy are widely employed for their identification through characteristic vibrational modes, electronic structure information derived from surface-sensitive analysis remains underexplored for these minerals. This study provides a comprehensive characterization of the chemical bonding and electronic structures of azurite and malachite through X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS), with particular emphasis on distinguishing subtle differences between these chemically similar minerals. High-resolution spectra of Cu 2p, C 1s, O 1s core levels and valence band regions were acquired using a Kratos AXIS Ultra spectrometer equipped with a monochromatic Al X-ray source, analyzing powdered mineral samples from South Australia and Western Australia. The Cu 2p core-level analysis revealed the most diagnostic spectroscopic differences. Azurite exhibits a single dominant Cu²⁺ photoelectron peak at 934.6 eV with two shake-up satellites, confirming homogeneous divalent copper. Malachite displays a more complex spectrum containing both Cu⁺ (932.9 eV, 2.0% observed) and Cu²⁺ (935.1 eV, 11.9% observed) components with three shake-up satellites, indicating mixed-valence character at the mineral surface. The 0.5 eV upward shift in Cu²⁺ binding energy reflects differences in hydrogen bonding and coordination geometry. In contrast, C 1s and O 1s spectra showed remarkable consistency between the two minerals: carbonate carbon binding energies were virtually identical (289.2–289.3 eV), and carbonate and hydroxyl oxygen displayed nearly identical binding energies with only 0.1 eV differences. However, intensity ratios of oxygen species directly reflected stoichiometric differences, validating spectral assignments. Valence band spectroscopy revealed a distinctive carbonate-derived feature at ~10–12 eV binding energy with substantially stronger intensity in azurite, reflecting its higher carbonate content. This study establishes XPS as a powerful complementary analytical method to FTIR and Raman spectroscopy, offering electronic fingerprinting for distinguishing azurite and malachite in complex multi-component systems. The surface-sensitive analysis uniquely detects redox processes and mixed-valence character unavailable through vibrational spectroscopy. These findings advance fundamental understanding of electronic structure in these historically important minerals and provide robust diagnostic criteria for authentication and conservation assessment of cultural heritage artifacts, archaeological corrosion products, and geochemical interpretation of weathered copper-bearing materials.

Keyword

Azurite; malachite; X-ray Photoelecton Spectroscopy (XPS); electronic structure; chemical bonding

References

[1] Jabbour M, Ilmen S, Ikenne M, Zoheir B, Souhassou M, Bouskri I, et al. Genesis of the Aït Abdellah Copper Deposit, Bou Azzer-El Graara Inlier, Anti-Atlas, Morocco. Minerals. 2025;15(5):545.

[2] Poot J, Verhaert M, Dekoninck A, Oummouch A, El Basbas A, Maacha L, et al. Characterization of Weathering Processes of the Giant Copper Deposit of Tizert (Igherm Inlier, Anti-Atlas, Morocco). Minerals. 2020;10(7):620.

[3] Melchiorre EB. Stable isotope and geochemical evidence for genesis of secondary copper deposits at Girilambone, New South Wales, Australia. Mineral Mag. 2022;86(4):634-43.

[4] Anthony JW, Bideaux RA, Bladh KW, Nichols MC. Handbook of Mineralogy. Mineral Data Publishing; 1995.

[5] Giester G, Rieck B, Stadlmann M. Structural differences between azurite and malachite. Mineral Mag. 2000;64:377-89.

[6] Zigan F, Schuster HD. Die Kristallstruktur von Azurit. Neues Jahrb Mineral, Monatsh. 1969;9:222-30.

[7] Frost RL, Kloprogge JT. Vibrational spectroscopy of azurite and malachite. Mineral Mag. 2002;66:1063-73.

[8] Eastaugh N, Walsh V, Chaplin T, Siddall R. Pigment Compendium. Routledge; 2008.

[9] Roy A. Artists’ Pigments: A Handbook. National Gallery of Art; 1993.

[10] Gao Z. Pigment Application and Color Matching Rules in Tang Dynasty Murals of the Dunhuang Mogao Grottoes. Commun Hum Res. 2025;86:152-8.

[11] Zhu Y, Qi G, Guo Y, Wang D. Analysis of Decorative Paintings in the Dragon and Tiger Hall of Yuzhen Palace: Culture, Materials, and Technology. Minerals. 2024;14(8):1022.

[12] Capriotti S, Medeghini L, Mignardi S, Petrelli M, Botticelli M. The blue road: Provenance study of azurite samples from historical locations through the analysis of minor and trace elements. Heliyon. 2023;9(8):e19099.

[13] Hradil D, Čermáková Z, Hradilová J, Bezdička P, Míková J. Trace and Minor Element Analysis of Azurite Blues in Fine Arts: Possibili-ties and Limitations in Provenance Studies. Appl Spectrosc. 2024;78(11):1136-53.

[14] Gravis D, Roy N, Ruffini-Ronzani N, Houssiau L, Felten A, Tumanov N, et al. Secondary ion mass spectrometry, a powerful tool for revealing ink formulations and animal skins in medieval manuscripts. R Soc Open Sci. 2023;10(6).

[15] Lauwers D, Cattersel V, Vandamme L, Van Eester A, De Langhe K, Moens L, et al. Pigment identification of an illuminated mediaeval manuscript De Civitate Dei by means of a portable Raman equipment. J Raman Spectrosc. 2014;45(11-12):1266-71.

[16] Schweitzer LC, Mathew A. Corrosion products on archaeological copper alloys. J Am Inst Conserv. 2001;40:1-13.

[17] Scott DA. Copper and Bronze in Art. Getty Publications; 2002.

[18] Mayyas A, Sekhaneh WA, Fuqara DA, Seiseh R, Al-Ajlouny F, Muheisen ZA, et al. Microstructural and Compositional Characterization of Roman Bronze Coins from Khirbat Edh-Dharih in Jordan. Arqueol Iberoam. 2023;52.

[19] Huarui H, Wenlong B, Dawei L, Jianhua H. Comprehensive Research on the Layered Corrosion of Archaeological Copper Wares: A Case Study from Qinghai, China. Stud Conserv. 2024;69(5):327-35.

[20] Bertrand L, Le Bihan L, Laval E. Non-destructive spectroscopies in heritage science. Chem Rev. 2013;113(7):5479-515.

[21] Derrick M, Stulik D, Landry J. Infrared Spectroscopy in Conservation Science. Getty Conservation Institute; 1999.

[22] Frost RL. Raman spectroscopy of basic copper carbonates. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 2002;58(10):2171-84.

[23] Kloprogge JT, Frost RL, Hickey L. FTIR and Raman study of malachite and azurite. Am Mineral. 2004;89(1):135-43.

[24] Biesinger MC, Payne BP, Lau LW, Gerson AR, Smart RSC. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic chemical state quantification of mixed nickel metal, oxide and hydroxide systems. Surf Interface Anal. 2009;41(4):324-32.

[25] Barr TL, Seal S. Nature of adventitious carbon on surfaces. J Vac Sci Technol A. 1995;13(3):1239-46.

[26] Liu Y, Meng H, Zhang S. Spectroscopic markers for copper carbonates in heritage objects. Appl Spectrosc. 2020;74(10):1291-302.

[27] Krzywiecki M, Grządziel L, Sarfraz A, Erbe A. Charge transfer quantification in a SnOx/CuPc semiconductor heterostructure: investigation of buried interface energy structure by photoelectron spectroscopies. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2017;19(19):11816-24.

[28] Lizoul B, Kzaiber F, Bentiss F, El Mamoune Z. Retention of Cu(II) ions by amorphous and apatitic tricalcium phosphates: an undemanding route to produce libethenite. J Southwest Jiaotong Univ. 2021;56:891-903.

[29] Tayar Galante M, Živković A, Alvim JC, Calchi Kleiner CC, Sangali M, Taylor SFR, et al. Arc Synthesis, Crystal Structure, and Photoelectrochemistry of Copper(I) Tungstate. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2021;13(28):32865-75.

[30] Shumilova MA, Pastukhova NN, Lomova NV, Kazantseva IS, Isupov NY, Rybin DS, et al. Thermal decomposition of copper(II) hydroxide and hydroxocarbonates according to X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy in operando. Z Kristallogr Cryst Mater. 2025;240:181-9.

[31] Nyborg L, Cao Y. Surface chemical and geometrical properties of pure copper powder intended for binder jetting and sintering. Surf Interface Anal. 2022;54(9):944-53.

[32] Liu D, Wang D, Xian Y, Tian X, Wen S. Enhancement of xanthate adsorption on chrysocolla surface via sodium diethyldithiocarbamate (DDTC) modification. Physicochem Probl Miner Process. 2022;58(6):152599.

[33] Park J, Son YG, Son CS, Hwang D. Influence of Oxygen Flow Rate on the Phase Structures and Properties for Copper Oxide Thin Films Deposited by RF Magnetron Sputtering. Coatings. 2024;14(8):930.

[34] Krylova V, Andrulevičius M. Optical, XPS and XRD Studies of Semiconducting Copper Sulfide Layers on a Polyamide Film. Int J Photoenergy. 2009;2009(1):304308.

[35] La Rosa-Toro A, Berenguer R, Quijada C, Montilla F, Morallón E, Vázquez JL. Preparation and Characterization of Copper-Doped Cobalt Oxide Electrodes. J Phys Chem B. 2006;110(47):24021-9.

[36] Liu F, Csetenyi L, Gadd GM. Amino acid secretion influences the size and composition of copper carbonate nanoparticles synthesized by ureolytic fungi. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2019;103(17):7217-30.

[37] Sun X, Huang YL, Wu D, Hu B, Zhang M, Tong X. Synthesis of a novel hydroxamic acid flotation collector and its flotation separation of malachite against quartz. Physicochem Probl Miner Process. 2022;58(4):149427.

[38] Mohanty P. Multiferroic nanoparticles of Ni doped CoCr2O4: An XPS study. In: BG Ganga, C Emanuela, JS Charles, REP Aletta, editors. Surface Science Spectra. American Vacuum Society; 2020. p. 014003.

[39] Batenkova AS, Rheingans B, Cancellieri C, Jeurgens LPH. Tuning the Surface State and Zeta Potential of Aged CuO Nanoparticles by Additive-Free Surface Treatments as Guided by XPS. Adv Mater. 2026;38(5):e13030.

[40] Piñón Espitia MF, Camacho Ríos ML, Lardizábal Gutiérrez D, Ochoa Lara MT, Verdugo Miranda S, Duarte Moller JA. Electronic effect on the L3,2 edges generated by Cu 3d and O 1s orbitals in CuO nanofibers, pure and doped with Mn. Nova Sci. 2024;16(32):1-7.

[41] Bandaranayake S, Patnaik A, Hruska E, Zhu Q, Sokolov AY, Baker LR. Electronic Structure and Ultrafast Electron Dynamics in CuO Photocatalysts Probed by Surface Sensitive Femtosecond X-ray Absorption Near-Edge Structure Spectroscopy. J Phys Chem Lett. 2023;14(15):3643-50.

[42] Alves JF, Peixoto LPF, Cappa de Oliveira LF. Resonance Raman Effect in Copper Carbonate Minerals Azurite and Malachite. J Raman Spectrosc. 2025;56(11):1154-61.

Copyright

© 2026 by the author(s).
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) license, which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not modified or adapted.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this paper

Chemical Bonding and Electronic Structures of Azurite and Malachite by X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy

How to cite this paper: J. Theo Kloprogge. (2026) Chemical Bonding and Electronic Structures of Azurite and Malachite by X-Ray Photoelectron SpectroscopyOAJRC Material Science8(1), 37-53.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/oajrcms.2026.06.004