magazinelogo

The Educational Review, USA

ISSN Online: 2575-7946 ISSN Print: 2575-7938 CODEN: TERUBB
Frequency: monthly Email: edu@hillpublisher.com
Total View: 6826797 Downloads: 1425697 Citations: 1026 (From Dimensions)
OpenAlex-based citation data
  • citations

    1417
  • h-index

    13
  • i10-index

    14
ArticleOpen Access http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/er.2026.04.005

The Impact of Implementing Smart Classrooms on Second Language Acquisition Among University English Majors: An Embodied Cognition Perspective

Feilin Lan, Meng Fan*

School of Foreign Languages, Research Centre for Applied Translation of Transportation and Engineering, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang 330013, Jiangxi, China.

*Corresponding author: Meng Fan

This research was funded by the Jiangxi Provincial Social Science Project ‘A Study of Cognitive Effects of Embodied Experience on L2 Semantic Processing’ (25YY23D); the 2025 Ministry of Education Industry-University Collaborative Education Project ‘Teaching Reform of University English Reading-Writing-Translation Course Cluster Based on Smart Classrooms’; Research Centre for Applied Translation of Transportation and Engineering-Jiangxi Provincial Key Research Base for Humanities and Social Sciences of Higher Education Project ‘Research on Translation of International Engineering Project Documents and Construction Manuals’ (JD20016); two East China Jiaotong University Teaching Reform Projects: ‘AI-Enpowered Teaching Reform and Practice in the Course Intercultural Communication from the Perspective of International Communication’ (1103626044) and ‘Innovative Practice of Integrating Jiangxi Cultural Features into the Ideological Political Education in the Course the Glimpse of Chinese Culture’ (1103625029).
Published: April 17, 2026

Abstract

Driven by educational digitalization and the New Liberal Arts initiative, smart classrooms have become central to instructional reform for English majors at universities in China. Conventional English instruction, grounded in a disembodied cognition paradigm that reduces language acquisition to rote memorization of abstract symbols, largely neglects bodily perception, situated experience, and environmental interaction. Embodied cognition offers a different account of how language is learned. Rather than locating cognition in the head alone, it holds that meaning is inseparable from bodily perception, physical movement, and the environment in which a person acts. This study draws on questionnaire responses from 247 English majors to investigate whether smart classrooms—in their present form—either support or undermine students’ learning. The data show a mixed picture. Students generally welcome smart-classroom instruction and report real gains in engagement and interaction, particularly in listening and speaking courses. At the same time, nearly half of them struggle with basic platform operation, attention fragmentation is widespread, and the deeper integration of technology with embodied experience remains largely unrealized. On the basis of these findings, we put forward a four-dimensional model—‘Embodiment-Technology-Instruction-Assessment’—intended to reorient smart classrooms toward what embodied cognition suggests language learning should actually look like.

Keyword

Embodied cognition; smart classroom; second language acquisition; learning engagement; multimodal interaction

References

Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. Longman.

Li, S. (2025). Multimedia bilingual learning dictionaries: Innovative pathways for technology-enhanced foreign language teaching models. Language and Culture Studies, (3), 54-58.

Liang, J.-C., & Hwang, G.-J. (2025). Embodied social agency in human-robot collaboration for promoting EFL learners’ persuasive communication and bodily-emotional awareness: A functional linguistics perspective. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 24291-24335.

Liu, Y. X. (2024). The origins and prospects of embodied cognition theory and second language acquisition: A case study of the English Audio-Visual-Oral course. Science and Education Journal (Electronic Edition), (6), 193-195.

Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). Academic Press.

Lu, S. Y., & Peng, C. (2022). Second language acquisition under embodied cognition theory. TCSOL Studies, (1), 31-37.

Macedonia, M. (2025). Your body as a tool to learn second language vocabulary. Behavioral Sciences, 15(8), 997.

Ni, C. B. (2023). Embodiment effects in foreign languages: Pathways and mechanisms. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 55(6), 876-886.

Shiang, R.-F., Chern, C.-L., & Chen, H.-C. (2024). Embodied cognition and L2 sentence comprehension: An eye-tracking study of motor representations. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 18, Article 1410242.

Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235-253). Newbury House.

Tan, S. X. (2025). Mechanisms and optimization pathways of digital English learning engagement among university students based on embodied cognition. Modern English, (15), 99-101.

Copyright

© 2026 by the author(s).
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) license, which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not modified or adapted.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this paper

The Impact of Implementing Smart Classrooms on Second Language Acquisition Among University English Majors: An Embodied Cognition Perspective

How to cite this paper: Feilin Lan, Meng Fan. (2026). The Impact of Implementing Smart Classrooms on Second Language Acquisition Among University English Majors: An Embodied Cognition PerspectiveThe Educational Review, USA10(4), 211-216.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/er.2026.04.005