References
[1] Liu Z, Lv A, Li T. Intensified drought threatens future food security in major food-producing countries. Atmosphere. 2024;16:34.
https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16010034.
[2] Nhamo L, Matchaya G, Mabhaudhi T, Nhlengethwa S, Nhemachena C, Mpandeli S. Cereal production trends under climate change: impacts and adaptation strategies in southern Africa. Agriculture. 2019;9:30. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture9020030.
[3] Erenstein O, Jaleta M, Sonder K, Mottaleb K, Prasanna BM. Global maize production, consumption and trade: trends and R&D implications. Food Secur. 2022;14:1295-1319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-022-01288-7.
[4] An X. Responses of water use efficiency to climate change in evapotranspiration and transpiration ecosystems. Ecol Indic. 2022;141:109157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109157.
[5] Mutanda M, Shimelis H, Chaplot V, Figlan S. Managing drought stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) production: strategies and impacts. S Afr J Plant Soil. 2025;42:1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/02571862.2025.2497229.
[6] Lloret J. High variability in carbon stable isotopes in the macroalga Ulva spp. and implications for eutrophication indicators. Sci Rep. 2025;15:40889. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-24788-w.
[7] Eggels S, Blankenagel S, Schön CC, Avramova V. The carbon isotopic signature of C4 crops and its applicability in breeding for climate resilience. Theor Appl Genet. 2021;134:1663-1675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-020-03761-3.
[8] Dunn PJH, Malinovsky D, Ogrinc N, Potočnik D, Flierl L, Rienitz O, et al. Re-determination of R (13C/12C) for Vienna Peedee belemnite (VPDB). Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2024;38. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.9773.
[9] Bowling DR, Pataki DE, Randerson JT. Carbon isotopes in terrestrial ecosystem pools and CO2 fluxes. New Phytol. 2008;178:24-40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02342.x.
[10] Hubick K, Farquhar G. Carbon isotope discrimination and the ratio of carbon gained to water lost in barley cultivars. Plant Cell Environ. 1989;12:795-804. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1989.tb01641.x.
[11] Farquhar GD, O’Leary MH, Berry JA. On the relationship between carbon isotope discrimination and the intercellular carbon dioxide concentration in leaves. Aust J Plant Physiol. 1982;9:121-137. https://doi.org/10.1071/pp9820121.
[12] Farquhar GD, von Caemmerer S, Berry JA. A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species. Planta. 1980;149:78-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00386231.
[13] Ma WT, Yu YZ, Wang X, Gong XY. Estimation of intrinsic water-use efficiency from δ13C signature of C3 leaves: assumptions and uncertainty. Front Plant Sci. 2023;13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1037972.
[14] Mutanda M, Chaplot V, Shimelis H, Shamuyarira KW, Figlan S. Determinants of the accuracy of using carbon isotopes in estimating water use efficiency of selected cereal and legume crops: a global perspective. Food Energy Secur. 2024;13.
https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.522.
[15] Knight JD, Livingston NJ, Van Kessel C. Carbon isotope discrimination and water-use efficiency of six crops grown under wet and dryland conditions. Plant Cell Environ. 1994;17:173-179.
[16] Cai J. Carbon isotope discrimination and water-use efficiency in field-grown wheat [thesis]. Stillwater: Oklahoma State University; 1992.
[17] Khazaei H, Mohammady SD, Zaharieva M, Monneveux P. Carbon isotope discrimination and water use efficiency in Iranian diploid, tetraploid and hexaploid wheats grown under well-watered conditions. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2009;56:105-114.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-008-9346-6.
[18] Li M, Peng C, Wang M, Yang Y, Zhang K, Li P, et al. Spatial patterns of leaf δ13C and its relationship with plant functional groups and environmental factors in China. J Geophys Res Biogeosci. 2017;122:1564-1575.
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016jg003529.
[19] Brett MJ, Baldini JUL, Gröcke DR. Environmental controls on stable isotope ratios in New Zealand Podocarpaceae: implications for palaeoclimate reconstruction. Glob Planet Change. 2014;120:38-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2014.05.010.
[20] de Oliveira TWG, Rubilar R, Sanquetta CR, Dalla Corte AP, Bozo D, Medina A, Mardones O, Emha V, Quiroga JJ, Valenzuela H. Changes in leaf physiology for Eucalyptus genotypes with increase in integral water stress and its consequence for initial growth in central Chile. Sci For. 2022;50:1-14.
[21] Dillen SY, Marron N, Koch B, Ceulemans R. Genetic variation of stomatal traits and carbon isotope discrimination in two hybrid poplar families (Populus deltoides ‘S9-2’ × P. nigra ‘Ghoy’ and P. deltoides ‘S9-2’ × P. trichocarpa ‘V24’). Ann Bot. 2008;102:399-407. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcn107.
[22] Ismael A, Xue J, Meason DF, Klápště J, Gallart M, Li Y, et al. Genetic variation in drought-tolerance traits and their relationships to growth in Pinus radiata D. Don under water stress. Front Plant Sci. 2022;12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.766803.
[23] Khodjaniyazova S, Nazari M, Garrard KP, Matos MPV, Jackson GP, Muddiman DC. Characterization of the spectral accuracy of an Orbitrap mass analyzer using isotope ratio mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 2018;90:1897-1906.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.7b03983.
[24] Scher MA, Barclay RS, Baczynski AA, Smith BA, Sappington J, Bennett LA, et al. The effect of CO2 concentration on carbon isotope discrimination during photosynthesis in Ginkgo biloba: implications for reconstructing atmospheric CO2 levels in the geologic past. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 2022;337:82-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2022.09.033.
[25] Alonso-Cantabrana H, von Caemmerer S. Carbon isotope discrimination as a diagnostic tool for C4 photosynthesis in C3-C4 intermediate species. J Exp Bot. 2016;67:3109-3121. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erv555.
[26] O’Leary MH, Osmond CB. Diffusional contribution to carbon isotope fractionation during dark CO2 fixation in CAM plants. Plant Physiol. 1980;66:931-934. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.66.5.931.
[27] Tcherkez G, Mahé A, Hodges M. 12C/13C fractionations in plant primary metabolism. Trends Plant Sci. 2011;16:499-506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2011.05.010.
[28] Wingate L, Seibt U, Moncrieff JB, Jarvis PG, Lloyd JON. Variations in 13C discrimination during CO2 exchange by Picea sitchensis branches in the field. Plant Cell Environ. 2007;30:600-616. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01647.x.
[29] Mutanda M, Shimelis H, Chaplot V, Shamuyarira KW, Figlan S. Agronomic performance and water use efficiency of newly developed wheat populations under drought-stressed and non-stressed conditions. Discov Appl Sci. 2025;7.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-025-06605-1.
[30] Hatfield JL, Dold C. Water-use efficiency: advances and challenges in a changing climate. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00103.
[31] Huxman TE, Monson RK. Stomatal responses of C3, C3-C4 and C4 Flaveria species to light and intercellular CO2 concentration: implications for the evolution of stomatal behaviour. Plant Cell Environ. 2003;26:313-322. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3040.2003.00964.x.
[32] Gowik U, Westhoff P. The path from C3 to C4 photosynthesis. Plant Physiol. 2010;155:56-63.
https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.110.165308.
[33] Cernusak LA, Ubierna N, Winter K, Holtum JAM, Marshall JD, Farquhar GD. Environmental and physiological determinants of carbon isotope discrimination in terrestrial plants. New Phytol. 2013;200:950-965. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12423.
[34] Yan N, Xu XF, Wang ZD, Huang JZ, Guo DP. Interactive effects of temperature and light intensity on photosynthesis and antioxidant enzyme activity in Zizania latifolia Turcz. plants. Photosynthetica. 2013;51:127-138.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11099-013-0009-2.
[35] Gonçalves AZ, Latansio S, Detmann KC, Marabesi MA, Neto AAC, Aidar MPM, et al. What does the RuBisCO activity tell us about a C3-CAM plant? Plant Physiol Biochem. 2020;147:172-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2019.12.020.
[36] Mutanda M, Shimelis H, Chaplot V, Madala NE, Figlan S. Association between agronomic traits and metabolite profiles on yield response and water use efficiency in newly developed wheat populations under drought stressed conditions. Acta Agric Scand B Soil Plant Sci. 2025;75. https://doi.org/10.1080/09064710.2025.2454389.
[37] Turfan N, Kara F, Yıldız F, Güney K, Kaya O. Revealing the environmental factors that influence the leaf biochemistry and total antioxidant activity of Prunus laurocerasus L. Horticulturae. 2025;11:1403. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11111403.
[38] Ferguson JN, Tidy ACT, Murchie EH, Wilson ZA. The potential of resilient carbon dynamics for stabilizing crop reproductive development and productivity during heat stress. Plant Cell Environ. 2021;44:2066-2089. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.14015.
[39] Pernicová N, Hlaváčová M, Findurová H, Čáslavský J, Urban O, Klem K, et al. Grain carbon isotopes indicate the ability of wheat plants to maintain enhanced intrinsic water-use efficiency even after short-term exposure to high temperatures and drought. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2023;205:108155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2023.108155.
[40] Sanz-Saez A, Maw MJW, Polania JA, Rao IM, Beebe SE, Fritschi FB. Using carbon isotope discrimination to assess genotypic differences in drought resistance of parental lines of common bean. Crop Sci. 2019;59:2153-2166.
https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2019.02.0085.
[41] Rukhsar A, Kanbar O, Mahmoudi H, Yousfi S, Serret MD, Araus JL. Influence of saline irrigation and genotype on yield, grain quality and physiological ideotypic indicators of bread wheat in hot arid zones. Agronomy. 2026;16:270.
https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16020270.
[42] Condon AG, Richards RA, Rebetzke GJ, Farquhar GD. Improving intrinsic water-use efficiency and crop yield. Crop Sci. 2002;42:122. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2002.0122.
[43] Ren H, Zhao M, Zhou BY, Zhou WB, Li KM, Qi H, et al. Understanding physiological mechanisms of variation in grain filling of maize under high planting density and varying nitrogen applicate rate. Front Nutr. 2022;9.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.998946.
[44] Butt S, Ali M, Fazil M, Latif Z. Seasonal variations in the isotopic composition of leaf and stem water from an arid region of Southeast Asia. Hydrol Sci J. 2010;55:844-848. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2010.487975.
[45] Moran JJ, Linley TJ, Makarem CN, Kelly JF, Wilcox Freeburg ED, Cleary DM, et al. Spectroscopy-based isotopic (δ13C) analysis for high spatial resolution of carbon exchange in the rhizosphere. Rhizosphere. 2022;23:100564.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rhisph.2022.100564.
[46] Srivastava A, Fleisher AJ, Hodges JT. Advancing primary direct method for absolute 13C/12C isotope amount ratio measurement of carbon dioxide in air using infrared absorption spectroscopy. Anal Chem. 2025;97:24326-24339.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.5c03260.
[47] Hwang JY, Kim BK, Kim MS, Choi JW, Kim TS, Lee WS. Evaluation of accuracy and precision of IRMS by using standard materials and applications. J Agric Chem Environ. 2016;05:211-222. https://doi.org/10.4236/jacen.2016.54022.
[48] Guillon S, Pili E, Agrinier P. Using a laser-based CO2 carbon isotope analyser to investigate gas transfer in geological media. Appl Phys B. 2012;107:449-457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-012-4942-8.
[49] Sim J, McGoverin C, Oey I, Frew R, Kebede B. Near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy accurately predicted isotope and elemental compositions for origin traceability of coffee. Food Chem. 2023;427:136695.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.136695.
[50] Hidalgo M, Sepulveda MDA, Muñoz C, Casanova M, Wasner D, Bodé S, et al. Predicting soil organic carbon mineralization rates Using δ13C, assessed by near-infrared spectroscopy, in depth profiles under permanent grassland along a latitudinal transect in Chile. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2022;22:2105-2117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-022-00797-w.
[51] Ancin-Murguzur FJ, Tarroux A, Bråthen KA, Bustamante P, Descamps S. Using near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) to estimate carbon and nitrogen stable isotope composition in animal tissues. Ecol Evol. 2021;11:10483.
[52] Ferrio JP, Bertran E, Nachit M, Royo C, Araus JL. Near infrared reflectance spectroscopy as a potential surrogate method for the analysis of δ13C in mature kernels of durum wheat. Aust J Agric Res. 2001;52:809-816.
[53] Fontaine J, Schirmer B, Hörr J. Near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) enables the fast and accurate prediction of essential amino acid contents. 2. Results for wheat, barley, corn, triticale, wheat bran/middlings, rice bran, and sorghum. J Agric Food Chem. 2002;50:3902-3911. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf011637k.
[54] Samadi SW, Munawar AA. Near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) data analysis for a rapid and simultaneous prediction of feed nutritive parameters. Data Brief. 2020;29:105211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2020.105211.
[55] Kumari M, Padhi SR, Arya M, Yadav R, Latha M, Pandey A, et al. Nutritional profiling of horse gram through NIRS-based multi-trait prediction modelling. Sci Rep. 2025;15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-01668-x.
[56] Farquhar GD, O’Leary MH, Berry JA. On the relationship between carbon isotope discrimination and the intercellular carbon dioxide concentration in leaves. Aust J Plant Physiol. 1982;9:121-137. https://doi.org/10.1071/pp9820121.
[57] Arco Molina JG, Helle G, Hadad MA, Roig FA. Variations in the intrinsic water-use efficiency of north Patagonian forests under a present climate change scenario: tree age, site conditions and long-term environmental effects. Tree Physiol. 2019;39:661-678.
https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpy144.
[58] Perdomo JA, Capó-Bauçà S, Carmo-Silva E, Galmés J. Rubisco and Rubisco activase play an important role in the biochemical limitations of photosynthesis in rice, wheat, and maize under high temperature and water deficit. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00490.
[59] Hatch MD, Slack CR. Photosynthesis by sugar-cane leaves. A new carboxylation reaction and the pathway of sugar formation. Biochem J. 1966;101:103-111. https://doi.org/10.1042/bj1010103.
[60] von Caemmerer S, Ghannoum O, Pengelly JJL, Cousins AB. Carbon isotope discrimination as a tool to explore C4 photosynthesis. J Exp Bot. 2014;65:3459-3470. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eru127.
[61] Huang G, Zhang X, Wang Y, Feng F, Mei X, Zhong X. Comparisons of WUE in twelve genotypes of winter wheat and the relationship between δ13C and WUE. PeerJ. 2019;7:e6767. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6767.
[62] Condon AG, Richards RA, Rebetzke GJ, Farquhar GD. Improving intrinsic water-use efficiency and crop yield. Crop Sci. 2002;42:122-131. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2002.1220.
[63] Chen J, Chang SX, Anyia AO. The physiology and stability of leaf carbon isotope discrimination as a measure of water-use efficiency in barley on the Canadian prairies. J Agron Crop Sci. 2011;197:1-11.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037x.2010.00440.x.
[64] Zhang H, Han K, Gu S, Wang D. Effects of supplemental irrigation on the accumulation, distribution and transportation of 13C-photosynthate, yield and water use efficiency of winter wheat. Agric Water Manag. 2019;214:1-8.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2018.12.028.
[65] Akhter J, Sabir SA, Atta BM, Ali Y, Lateef Z. Carbon isotope discrimination as a selection tool for high yielding wheat genotypes for water limited environments. In: Greater agronomic water use efficiency in wheat and rice using carbon isotope discrimination; 2012. p. 105.
[66] Mutanda M. Screening of newly developed wheat genotypes for improved yield and yield components drought tolerance and water use efficiency [thesis]. Florida Science Campus: University of South Africa; 2025.
[67] Bchir A, Escalona JM, Gallé A, Hernández-Montes E, Tortosa I, Braham M, et al. Carbon isotope discrimination (δ13C) as an indicator of vine water status and water use efficiency (WUE): looking for the most representative sample and sampling time. Agric Water Manag. 2016;167:11-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2015.12.018.
[68] Stewart GR, Turnbull MH, Schmidt S, Erskine PD. 13C natural abundance in plant communities along a rainfall gradient: a biological integrator of water availability. Aust J Plant Physiol. 1995;22:51-55. https://doi.org/10.1071/PP9950051.
[69] Padilla FM, Mommer L, de Caluwe H, Smit-Tiekstra AE, Visser EJW, de Kroon H. Effects of extreme rainfall events are independent of plant species richness in an experimental grassland community. Oecologia. 2019;191:177-190.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-019-04476-z.
[70] Sinton P, Seastedt T, Bennett B, Bock C, Bock J. C₃ and C₄ species changes identified by δ13C values of soil organic matter in a Colorado prairie. West North Am Nat. 2000:445-450.
[71] Shi H, Wang X, Xu M, Zhang H, Luo Y. Characteristics of soil C:N ratio and δ13C in wheat-maize cropping system of the North China Plain and influences of the Yellow River. Sci Rep. 2017;7:16854. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17060-3.
[72] Schmidhalter U, Oertli JJ. Transpiration/biomass ratio for carrots as affected by salinity, nutrient supply and soil aeration. Plant Soil. 1991;135:125-132. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00014785.
[73] Sim HS, Jo JS, Moon YH, Jung SB, Lee TY, Shin HR, et al. Development of a strawberry transpiration model based on a simplified Penman–Monteith model under different irrigation regimes. Hortic Environ Biotechnol. 2025;66:539-552.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13580-025-00677-z.
[74] Devi MJ, Reddy VR. Transpiration response of cotton to vapor pressure deficit and its relationship with stomatal traits. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01572.
[75] Li X, Niu Y, Cui X, Cui Y, Chen S, Shi S, et al. Temperature modulates nutrient metabolism and antioxidative fluctuations in Riptortus pedestris. Agronomy. 2025;15:1300. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15061300.
[76] Flexas J. Drought-inhibition of photosynthesis in C3 plants: stomatal and non-stomatal limitations revisited. Ann Bot. 2002;89:183-189. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcf027.
[77] Longinelli A, Lenaz R, Ori C, Selmo E. Concentrations and delta13C values of atmospheric CO2 from oceanic atmosphere through time: polluted and non-polluted areas. Tellus B. 2005;57:385-390. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2005.00166.x.
[78] Huang G, Zhang X, Wang Y, Feng F, Mei X, Zhong X. Comparisons of WUE in twelve genotypes of winter wheat and the relationship between δ13C and WUE. PeerJ. 2019;7:e6767. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6767.
[79] Nadaradjan S, Impa SM, Parsi SG, Sheshshayee MS, Udayakumar M, Prasad TG. Overlapping markers for WUE and carbon isotope discrimination in doubled haploid population of rice. J Plant Biol. 2005;32:117-124.
[80] Anyia AO, Slaski JJ, Nyachiro JM, Archambault DJ, Juskiw P. Relationship of carbon isotope discrimination to water use efficiency and productivity of barley under field and greenhouse conditions. J Agron Crop Sci. 2007;193:313-323.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0379.2007.00323.
[81] Chen J, Chang SX, Anyia AO. The physiology and stability of leaf carbon isotope discrimination as a measure of water-use efficiency in barley on the Canadian prairies. J Agron Crop Sci. 2011;197:1-11.
[82] Yang W, Li PF. Association of carbon isotope discrimination with leaf gas exchange and water use efficiency in maize following soil amendment with superabsorbent hydrogel. Plant Soil Environ. 2018;64:484-490. https://doi.org/10.17221/463/2018-pse.
[83] Zhang C, Zhang J, Zhang H, Zhao J, Wu Q, Zhao Z, et al. Mechanisms for the relationships between water-use efficiency and carbon isotope composition and specific leaf area of maize (Zea mays L.) under water stress. Plant Growth Regul. 2015;77:233-243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-015-0056-8.
[84] Emendack Y, Herzog H, Gotz KP, Malinowski DP. Mid-season water stress on yield and water use of millet (Panicum miliaceum) and sorghum (Sorghum bicolour L. Moench). Aust J Crop Sci. 2011;5:1486-1492.
[85] Hossain MM, Azad MAK, Alam MS, El-Jaoual Eaton T. Estimation of variability, heritability and genetic advance for phenological, physiological and yield contributing attributes in wheat genotypes under heat stress condition. Am J Plant Sci. 2021;12:586-602. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2021.124039.
[86] Hausmann NJ, Juenger TE, Sen S, Stowe KA, Dawson TE, Simms EL. Quantitative trait loci affecting δ13C and response to differential water availibility in Arabidopsis thaliana. Evolution. 2005;59:81-96.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb00896.x.
[87] Laza MR, Kondo M, Ideta O, Barlaan E, Imbe T. Identification of quantitative trait loci for δ13C and productivity in irrigated lowland rice. Crop Sci. 2006;46:763-773. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2005.05.0084.
[88] Tian J, Zhang H, Wang A, Wu J, Rosner S, Zhu K, et al. Unravelling the combined effects of drought and nitrogen addition on carbon assimilation and reserves in Korean pine saplings. Front Plant Sci. 2025;16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1574468.
[89] Mu X, Chen Y. The physiological response of photosynthesis to nitrogen deficiency. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2021;158:76-82.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.11.019.
[90] Kano-Nakata M, Tatsumi J, Inukai Y, Asanuma S, Yamauchi A. Effect of various intensities of drought stress on δ13C variation among plant organs in rice: comparison of two cultivars. Am J Plant Sci. 2014;05:1686-1693.
https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2014.511183.
[91] Barratt GE, Murchie EH, Sparkes DL. Water use efficiency responses to fluctuating soil water availability in contrasting commercial sugar beet varieties. Front Plant Sci. 2023;14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1119321.
[92] Brugnoli E, Lauteri M. Effects of salinity on stomatal conductance, photosynthetic capacity, and carbon isotope discrimination of salt-tolerant (Gossypium hirsutum L.) and salt-sensitive (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) C3 non-halophytes. Plant Physiol. 1991;95:628-635. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.95.2.628.
[93] Yang Z, Jiang Y, Qiu R, Gong X, Agathokleous E, Hu W, et al. Heat stress decreased transpiration but increased evapotranspiration in gerbera. Front Plant Sci. 2023;14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1119076.
[94] Khanzada A, Yan K, Hu W, Malko M, Khan KA, Bao Y, et al. Heat stress response mechanisms and resilience strategies in wheat. J Agron Crop Sci. 2025;211. https://doi.org/101111/jac.70023.
[95] Mmbando GS. The link between changing in host carbon allocation and resistance to Magnaporthe oryzae: a possible tactic for mitigating the rice blast fungus. Plant Signal Behav. 2024;19. https://doi.org/10.1080/15592324.2024.2326870.
[96] Xiao Y, Liu J, Li Y, Wang Z, Xin P, Zhang J, et al. Leaf morphology-δ13C synergy in drought response and G×E interactions in Toona sinensis. Trees For People. 2026;24:101189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2026.101189.
[97] Song X, Miao L, Jiao X, Ibrahim M, Li J. Regulating vapor pressure deficit and soil moisture improves tomato and cucumber plant growth and water productivity in the greenhouse. Horticulturae. 2022;8:147. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8020147.
[98] Chen L, Bontempo L. Application of isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS) in the geographical determination of selected herbs: a review. TrAC Trends Anal Chem. 2025;183:118107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2024.118107.
[99] Perini M, Pianezze S, Bontempo L. Stable isotope ratio mass spectrometry and site-specific natural isotope fractionation-nuclear magnetic resonance applications to discriminate between synthetic and natural analogs: a review. TrAC Trends Anal Chem. 2024;180:117966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2024.117966.
[100] Gong XY, Schäufele R, Schnyder H. Bundle-sheath leakiness and intrinsic water use efficiency of a perennial C4 grass are increased at high vapour pressure deficit during growth. J Exp Bot. 2016;68:321-333. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erw417.
[101] Yang W, Li PF. Association of carbon isotope discrimination with leaf gas exchange and water use efficiency in maize following soil amendment with superabsorbent hydrogel. Plant Soil Environ. 2018;64:484-490. https://doi.org/10.17221/463/2018-pse.
[102] Zhang C, Zhang J, Zhang H, Zhao J, Wu Q, Zhao Z, et al. Mechanisms for the relationships between water-use efficiency and carbon isotope composition and specific leaf area of maize (Zea mays L.) under water stress. Plant Growth Regul. 2015;77:233-243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-015-0056-8.
[103] Cornwell WK, Wright IJ, Turner J, Maire V, Barbour MM, Cernusak LA, et al. Climate and soils together regulate photosynthetic carbon isotope discrimination within C3 plants worldwide. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 2018;27:1056-1067.
https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12764.
[104] Centritto M, Lauteri M, Monteverdi MC, Serraj R. Leaf gas exchange, carbon isotope discrimination, and grain yield in contrasting rice genotypes subjected to water deficits during the reproductive stage. J Exp Bot. 2009;60:2325-2339.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erp123.
[105] Moghaddam A, Raza A, Vollmann J, Ardakani MR, Wanek W, Gollner G, et al. Carbon isotope discrimination and water use efficiency relationships of alfalfa genotypes under irrigated and rain-fed organic farming. Eur J Agron. 2013;50:82-89.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2013.05.010.
[106] Kumar S, Singh B. Effect of water stress on carbon isotope discrimination and Rubisco activity in bread and durum wheat genotypes. Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2009;15:281-286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-009-0032-8.
[107] Gao J, Wang F, Sun J, Tian Z, Hu H, Jiang S, et al. Enhanced Rubisco activation associated with maintenance of electron transport alleviates inhibition of photosynthesis under low nitrogen conditions in winter wheat seedlings. J Exp Bot. 2018.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ery315.
[108] Beidler KV, Taylor BN, Strand AE, Cooper ER, Schönholz M, Pritchard SG. Changes in root architecture under elevated concentrations of CO2 and nitrogen reflect alternate soil exploration strategies. New Phytol. 2015;205:1153-1163.
https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13123.
[109] Théroux-Rancourt G, Herrera JC, Voggeneder K, De Berardinis F, Luijken N, Nocker L, et al. Analyzing anatomy over three dimensions unpacks the differences in mesophyll diffusive area between sun and shade Vitis vinifera leaves. AoB Plants. 2023;15.
https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plad001.
[110] Budhlakoti N, Kushwaha AK, Rai A, Chaturvedi KK, Kumar A, Pradhan AK, et al. Genomic selection: a tool for accelerating the efficiency of molecular breeding for development of climate-resilient crops. Front Genet. 2022;13.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.832153.
[111] Raman H, Raman R, Pirathiban R, McVittie B, Sharma N, Liu S, et al. Multienvironment QTL analysis delineates a major locus associated with homoeologous exchanges for water-use efficiency and seed yield in canola. Plant Cell Environ. 2022;45:2019-2036. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.14337.