magazinelogo

Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Science

ISSN Online: 2576-0548 ISSN Print: 2576-0556 CODEN: JHASAY
Frequency: monthly Email: jhass@hillpublisher.com
Total View: 6192449 Downloads: 1827770 Citations: 319 (From Dimensions)
ArticleOpen Access http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/jhass.2026.05.010

Interstices of Law: Narrative Repetition and Deferred Justice in Nadine Gordimer’s None to Accompany Me

Lingran Kong

Harbin Normal University, Harbin 150000, Heilongjiang, China.

*Corresponding author: Lingran Kong

This work was supported by the National Social Science Foundation of China [22BWW065].
Published: May 29,2026

Abstract

This article examines Nadine Gordimer’s None to Accompany Me (1994) through the intersection of legal philosophy and narrative theory to interrogate the paradox of transitional justice in post-apartheid South Africa. Drawing on Peter Brooks’ concepts of “repetition and difference” and legal rhetoric, the study traces how the “interstices” of law—procedural loopholes, temporal delays, and constitutional gaps in land reform—generate narrative energy while perpetually deferring justice. Through a paired reading of the Odendaal attack and the Philemon Maseko murder, the paper argues that these legal gaps function as productive voids: they produce the conditions of black homelessness and racial violence that the law ostensibly seeks to resolve. The analysis demonstrates how the white lawyer Vera Stark’s trajectory from a subject of revenge desire to a bureaucratic witness of structural injustice mirrors the novel’s critique of legal formalism. The article further explores how the “shroud of order” metaphor captures law’s double function of concealing and preserving corporeal violence, and how the “fallible” Constitutional Commission institutionalizes rather than resolves legal interstices. Ultimately, the paper contends that Gordimer transforms legal loopholes into narrative form, revealing justice not as a terminal state but as a perpetual, unstable movement between procedural delay and the ethical demand for immediate recognition.

Keywords

Nadine Gordimer; None to Accompany Me; democratic transition; narrative desire; justice

References

Barnard, R., & van de Vlies, A. (Eds.). (2019). South African writing in transition. Bloomsbury Academic.

Brink, A. (1998). Stories of history: Re-imagining the past in post-apartheid narrative. In S. Nuttall & C. Coetzee (Eds.), Negotiating the past: The making of memory in South Africa (pp. 29-42). Oxford University Press.

Brooks, P. (1984). Reading for the plot: Design and intention in narrative. Harvard University Press.

Brooks, P. (1996). Narrative and rhetoric in the law. In P. Brooks & P. Gewirtz (Eds.), Law’s stories: Narrative and rhetoric in the law (pp. 14-22). Yale University Press.

Clingman, S. (2012). Writing the interregnum: Literature and the end of apartheid. In D. Attwell & D. Attridge (Eds.), The Cambridge history of South African literature (pp. 640-655). Cambridge University Press.

Gordimer, N. (1994). None to accompany me. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Gordimer, N. (1999). Living in hope and history: Notes from our century. Bloomsbury.

Gordimer, N. (2010). Telling times: Writing and living, 1954-2008 (L. Carey, Ed.). W.W. Norton & Co.

Head, D. (1995). Gordimer’s None to accompany me: Revisionism and interregnum. Research in African Literatures, 26(4), 46-57.

Kiguwa, P. (2024). On proceedings too terrible (but necessary) to relate: Land restitution and violence in South Africa. South African Journal of Science, 120(5-6), 1-9.
https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2024/17251

Mtero, F., Gumede, N., & Ramantsima, K. (2023). Elite capture in South Africa’s land redistribution: The convergence of policy bias, corrupt practices and class dynamics. Journal of Southern African Studies, 49(1), 5-24.

https://doi.org/10.1080/03057070.2023.2165809

Nuttall, S. (2004). City forms and writing the ‘now’ in South Africa. Journal of Southern African Studies, 30(4), 731-748.

https://doi.org/10.1080/0305707042000314022

Ojiakor, C. T., & Ezenwamadu, N. (2022). Re-thinking of queer voices in the new South Africa: Nadine Gordimer’s None to accompany me. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences, 7(1), 249-255.

https://doi.org/10.22161/ijels.71.37

Copyright

© 2026 by the author(s).
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) license, which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not modified or adapted.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this paper

Interstices of Law: Narrative Repetition and Deferred Justice in Nadine Gordimer’s None to Accompany Me

How to cite this paper: Lingran Kong. (2026) Interstices of Law: Narrative Repetition and Deferred Justice in Nadine Gordimer’s None to Accompany Me. Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Science10(5), 568-571.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/jhass.2026.05.010