magazinelogo

Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Science

ISSN Online: 2576-0548 ISSN Print: 2576-0556 CODEN: JHASAY
Frequency: monthly Email: jhass@hillpublisher.com
Total View: 6541209 Downloads: 1917439 Citations: 319 (From Dimensions)
ArticleOpen Access http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/jhass.2026.05.007

Historical Issues in New Zealand’s Ethnic Relations Based on the Treaty of Waitangi

Jiahao Wei

Minzu University of China, Beijing 100081, China.

*Corresponding author: Jiahao Wei

This paper is supported by Understanding China · Translating China: Comprehensive Translation, Teaching Team Program of Northwest Normal University on Morals and Values Education throughout Curriculum in 2023: (Project No. 202320051343).
Published: May 27, 2026

Abstract

In late 2024, large-scale demonstrations took place in New Zealand to defend the rights and interests of the indigenous Māori people, which can be traced to the Treaty of Waitangi, signed in 1840 between representatives of the British Crown and Māori chiefs. Because the English and Māori versions of the treaty diverged in their semantic understandings of concepts such as “sovereignty,” “property,” and “pre-emption”, disputes surrounding the treaty and its interpretation have persisted for many years, thus gradually becoming historical issues in New Zealand’s ethnic relations. The core of the disputes lies in the fact that modern constitutional interpretation of concepts such as “contract” and “sovereignty” differed sharply from Māori interpretation. Such divergence also reveals the practical dilemma of treaty constitutionalism. 

Keyword

New Zealand; Māori; ethnic relations; Treaty of Waitangi; treaty constitutionalism

References

Ding, M. (2018). The negotiation of ethnic relations: New Zealand’s social contract and biculturalism. Journal of World Peoples Studies, (4), 11-20.

Li, J. (2006). The history and current situation of indigenous Māori in New Zealand. Journal of World Peoples Studies, (5), 73-79.

Li, J. B., & Yang, K. J. (2024, December 1). The dispute over the Treaty of Waitangi reflects social cleavages in New Zealand. Guangming Daily, p. 8.

Li, Q. Y., Xiong, K. X., & Zhang, P. Q. (2012). Summarization of New Zealand’s ethnic policy. Minzu Tribune, (5), 31-38.

Liu, F. F. (2022). The Māori “Magna Carta”: An examination of the Treaty of Waitangi in New Zealand. Chinese Journal of British Studies, (2), 146-159.

Najita, S. Y. (2006). Decolonizing cultures in the Pacific: Reading history and trauma in contemporary fiction. London: Routledge.

Tu, K. (2015). Chai Jin’s iron certificate: The doctrine of treaty constitutionalism and its frustrations. Journal of East China University of Political Science and Law, 18(5), 78-92.

Tully, J. (1995). Strange multiplicity: Constitutionalism in an age of diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wang, S. M. (2015). The Treaty of Waitangi and the “transfer of sovereignty.” World History, (4), 101-113.

Copyright

© 2026 by the author(s).
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) license, which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not modified or adapted.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this paper

Historical Issues in New Zealand’s Ethnic Relations Based on the Treaty of Waitangi

How to cite this paper: Jiahao Wei. (2026) Historical Issues in New Zealand’s Ethnic Relations Based on the Treaty of Waitangi. Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Science10(5), 549-553.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/jhass.2026.05.007