magazinelogo

Translation and Foreign Language Learning

ISSN Online: 3069-0315 ISSN Print: 3070-3077 CODEN:
Frequency: monthly Email: tfll@hillpublish.com
Total View: 326919 Downloads: 74483 Citations: 0 (From Dimensions)
ArticleTranslation Theories and Skills http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/tfll.2025.12.003

Composite Role Construction of Howard Goldblatt as the Translator of Frog: A Study Based on Topic Modeling

Angran Du, Yu Hou*

School of Foreign Studies, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004, Hebei, China.

*Corresponding author: Yu Hou

This work was supported by the 2024 Hebei Province Graduate Education Reform Project (YJG2024023), “Con-structing a Digital Humanities-Oriented Translation Studies Course Model and Resource Database”.
Published: December 31, 2025

Abstract

This study examines macro-thematic rewriting in Howard Goldblatt’s translation of Frog by combining topic modeling with Jensen–Shannon divergence. The findings reveal that Goldblatt’s rewriting does not substitute original topics but rather reconstructs the thematic framework. This reconstruction is achieved through a redistribution of topics, whereby topics less aligned with target-reader expectations undergo thematic collapse and are reallocated into dominant macro-topics. Specifically, the translation foregrounds reproduction and rural gov-ernance as major topics, with alienation gaining prominence and family life slightly downplayed. It further identifies how three types of rewriting strategies—equivalent thematic foregrounding, creative thematic foregrounding, and dethematic foregrounding—collectively construct Goldblatt’s composite translator role as faithful transcriber, selective reconstructor, cultural harmonizer, and implicit religious-symbol implanter. The study suggests that, in bringing Chinese literature to a global readership, the crucial issue lies not simply in whether source-text topics are preserved, but in how they are rewritten in translation to be accessible to target readers.

Keyword

Topic modeling; thematic rewriting; translator role construction of Howard Gold-blatt; Frog

References

Aletras, N., & Stevenson, M. (2014). Measuring the similarity between automatically generated topics. In Proceedings of the 14th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 22-27).

Bassnett, S., & Lefevere, A. (1990). Translation, history and culture. Pinter Publishers.

Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y., & Jordan, M. I. (2003). Latent Dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3, 993-1022.

Feng, Z. B., & Dang, Z. S. (2019). On foregrounding in Howard Goldblatt’s translation of Ruined City. Foreign Language Education, 40(1), 84-89.

Goldblatt, H. (2016). Frog. Viking.

Hall, D., Jurafsky, D., & Manning, C. D. (2008). Studying the history of ideas using topic models. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 363-371).

Hu, Z. Y., & Peng, J. Z. (2024). Howard Goldblatt’s translation with deletion and modification and its inspirations for Chinese culture to go global. Chinese Culture Research, 3, 160-169.

Huo, Y. H., & Zheng, J. M. (2025). A study on the role construction of James Legge as the translator of the Four Books: an empirical analysis based on topic modeling. Translation Research and Teaching, 4, 55-64.

Jaworska, S., & Nanda, A. (2018). Doing well by talking good? A topic modelling-assisted discourse study of corporate social responsibility. Applied Linguistics, 39(3), 373-399.

Jiang, Z. K., & Lv, Q. X. (2025). Exploring thematic rewritings in literary translation through LDA topic modeling: a case study of The Field of Life and Death. Translation Studies, 1-19.

Leech, G., & Short, M. (2001). Style in fiction: A linguistic introduction to English fictional prose (2nd ed.). Pearson Education.

Liu, Y. H. (2019). A study of Howard Goldblatt’s translation. Nanjing University Press.

Lv, S. S., & Guo, Q. (2025). Two consensuses and tensions in Howard Goldblatt’s translation of Chinese literature. Chinese Translators Journal, 6, 80-85.

Meng, X. C. (2015). A study of the translation by Howard Goldblatt as a Glocal Chimerican. Journal of Foreign Languages, 38(4), 77-87.

Mo, Y. (2012). 蛙[Frog]. Shanghai Literature and Art Publishing House.

Shan, D. L., & Chen, B. H. (2025). On Howard Goldblatt’s translation of contemporary Chinese literature: from the perspective of translator’s identity. Shanghai Journal of Translators, 6, 86-90.

Shao, L. (2014). Foregrounding in the English translation of Mo Yan. Contemporary Foreign Language Studies, 2, 48-52.

Song, Y. G. (2024). Field linkage and capital collaboration: inspiration from the overseas translation, publication and communication mode of Goldblatt’s translated works. Publishing Research, 1, 91-98.

Sun, Y. X. (2015). Sinologists’ complex attitude to Chinese culture: with Howard Goldblatt as an example. Journal of Tongji University (Social Science Edition), 26(2), 95-99.

Zhou, L. S. (2014). An analysis of translator’s role-shifting behavior in applied translation. Contemporary Foreign Language Studies, 2, 21-24.

Copyright

© 2025 by the author(s).
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) license, which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not modified or adapted.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this paper

Composite Role Construction of Howard Goldblatt as the Translator of Frog: A Study Based on Topic Modeling

How to cite this paper: Angran Du, Yu Hou. (2025). Composite Role Construction of Howard Goldblatt as the Translator of Frog: A Study Based on Topic Modeling. Translation and Foreign Language Learning1(5), 767-772.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/tfll.2025.12.003