This work was supported by the 2024 Hebei Province Graduate Education Reform Project (YJG2024023), “Con-structing a Digital Humanities-Oriented Translation Studies Course Model and Resource Database”.
References
Aletras, N., & Stevenson, M. (2014). Measuring the similarity between automatically generated topics. In Proceedings of the 14th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 22-27).
Bassnett, S., & Lefevere, A. (1990). Translation, history and culture. Pinter Publishers.
Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y., & Jordan, M. I. (2003). Latent Dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3, 993-1022.
Feng, Z. B., & Dang, Z. S. (2019). On foregrounding in Howard Goldblatt’s translation of Ruined City. Foreign Language Education, 40(1), 84-89.
Goldblatt, H. (2016). Frog. Viking.
Hall, D., Jurafsky, D., & Manning, C. D. (2008). Studying the history of ideas using topic models. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 363-371).
Hu, Z. Y., & Peng, J. Z. (2024). Howard Goldblatt’s translation with deletion and modification and its inspirations for Chinese culture to go global. Chinese Culture Research, 3, 160-169.
Huo, Y. H., & Zheng, J. M. (2025). A study on the role construction of James Legge as the translator of the Four Books: an empirical analysis based on topic modeling. Translation Research and Teaching, 4, 55-64.
Jaworska, S., & Nanda, A. (2018). Doing well by talking good? A topic modelling-assisted discourse study of corporate social responsibility. Applied Linguistics, 39(3), 373-399.
Jiang, Z. K., & Lv, Q. X. (2025). Exploring thematic rewritings in literary translation through LDA topic modeling: a case study of The Field of Life and Death. Translation Studies, 1-19.
Leech, G., & Short, M. (2001). Style in fiction: A linguistic introduction to English fictional prose (2nd ed.). Pearson Education.
Liu, Y. H. (2019). A study of Howard Goldblatt’s translation. Nanjing University Press.
Lv, S. S., & Guo, Q. (2025). Two consensuses and tensions in Howard Goldblatt’s translation of Chinese literature. Chinese Translators Journal, 6, 80-85.
Meng, X. C. (2015). A study of the translation by Howard Goldblatt as a Glocal Chimerican. Journal of Foreign Languages, 38(4), 77-87.
Mo, Y. (2012). 蛙[Frog]. Shanghai Literature and Art Publishing House.
Shan, D. L., & Chen, B. H. (2025). On Howard Goldblatt’s translation of contemporary Chinese literature: from the perspective of translator’s identity. Shanghai Journal of Translators, 6, 86-90.
Shao, L. (2014). Foregrounding in the English translation of Mo Yan. Contemporary Foreign Language Studies, 2, 48-52.
Song, Y. G. (2024). Field linkage and capital collaboration: inspiration from the overseas translation, publication and communication mode of Goldblatt’s translated works. Publishing Research, 1, 91-98.
Sun, Y. X. (2015). Sinologists’ complex attitude to Chinese culture: with Howard Goldblatt as an example. Journal of Tongji University (Social Science Edition), 26(2), 95-99.
Zhou, L. S. (2014). An analysis of translator’s role-shifting behavior in applied translation. Contemporary Foreign Language Studies, 2, 21-24.