magazinelogo

Advance in Sustainability

ISSN Online: 2769-3074 CODEN: ASDUAX
Frequency: Instant publication Email:
sustainability@hillpublish.com
Total View: 311637 Downloads: 19270 Citations: 21 (From Dimensions)

Volumes & Issues

Current Issue

All Volumes

ArticleOpen Access http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/as.2025.12.003

Contemporary Issues in Transboundary Water Management in Africa and the Middle East: Can There Be Sustainable Options to Address Power Imbalances?

U. J. Jimmy

Department of Geography and Natural Resources Management, University of Uyo, Uyo 520003, Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria.

*Corresponding author:U. J. Jimmy

Published: January 16,2026

Abstract

The management of shared freshwater resources in Africa and the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) regions, encompassing vital basins like the Nile, Euphrates-Tigris, and Jordan, faces a confluence of escalating challenges that are funda-mentally reshaping their hydro-political landscapes. This paper argues that traditional water scarcity is now compounded by dynamic, emerging threats: accelerating climate change impacts, unilateral hydrological infrastructure projects, and the weaponization of water in conflict zones. This analysis, utilizing the Hydro-Hegemony and Water-Energy-Food (WEF) Nexus frameworks, identifies and characterizes these critical challenges. Climate change acts as a conflict multiplier, intensifying competition and rendering outdated water-sharing agreements obsolete. Simultaneously, upstream states’ pursuit of large-scale projects, such as Ethiopia’s GERD or Turkey’s GAP, solidifies their hydro-hegemonic control, bypassing the vague principle of “equitable utilization” and escalating regional tensions. Furthermore, the deliberate targeting of water infrastructure in conflict zones, particularly across MENA, is a destructive emerging threat with dire humanitarian and long-term security implications. The overarching problem is the persistent institutional and governance gap: the failure to translate hydrological interdependence into enforceable, equitable basin-wide agreements. Using descriptive methodology, the paper proposes policy recommendations rooted in the Environmental Peacebuilding framework, including: mandatory data sharing, the negotiation of binding legal frameworks with clear operational rules, and mechanisms to address power asymmetry through compensatory benefits. Resolving these disputes requires a shift toward integrated, science-based, and inclusive governance to ensure regional stability and water security.

Keywords

Transboundary Water; Hydro-Hegemony; Climate Change; Water Security; Nile; Euphrates-Tigris; Water Weaponization

References

[1] Fanack Water. Water Conflicts to Watch in the MENA Region. Water Pract Technol. 2025.

[2] Zeitoun M, Warner J. Hydro-hegemony—A Framework for Analysis of Transboundary Water Conflicts. Water Policy. 2006;8(5):435-60.

[3] Mirumachi N. Transboundary Water Politics in the Developing World. Routledge; 2015.

[4] Zeitoun M, Mirumachi N. Hydro-hegemony and international water law: grappling with the gaps of power and law. Water Policy. 2008;10(S2):103-19.

[5] Salman SA. The Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD): Challenges to Egypt's Security Approach. Int Polit Middle East. 2021.

[6] Al-Saidi M. The Euphrates–Tigris Basin: A Case Study in Surface Water Conflict Resolution. J Nat Resour Life Sci Educ. 2002;31(1):13-20.

[7] Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Troubled Waters in Conflict and a Changing Climate: Transboundary Basins Across the Middle East and North Africa. 2024.

[8] UN-Water. Progress on Transboundary Water Cooperation: Global Baseline for SDG Indicator 6.5.2. 2021.

[9] Ide T. Environmental peacebuilding: Towards a theoretical framework. Coop Confl. 2018;53(4):565-82.

[10] Cascao AE. Ethiopia’s hydro-political challenge to Egypt’s Nile control. German Development Institute / Deutsches Institut für Entwick-lungspolitik (DIE). 2009.

[11] Daoudy M. Water politics in the Middle East: Power struggles, hydro-hegemony, and human security. Indiana University Press; 2009.

[12] Kibret KS. Sudan and Egypt's hydro-politics in the Nile River Basin. IDE Discussion Paper. 2020;(818).

[13] Yihdego Z. Counter-hegemony in the Nile Basin: The GERD and Ethiopia’s challenge to Egyptian dominance. Water Int. 2017;42(3):294-312.

[14] Cascao AE. Revisiting hydro-hegemony from a benefit-sharing perspective: the case of the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam. German Institute of Development and Sustainability. 2015.

[15] Zeleke G. The rise of water utilization in up-stream riparian countries in the Nile Basin. Water Balance Study of the Upper White Nile Basin Flows in the Late Nineteenth Century. 2019.

[16] Selby J. Water and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict: critical analysis of political discourses. Middle East J. 2003;57(4):567-90.

[17] Dellapenna JW. Egypt, Ethiopia, and the Nile: The economics of international water law. Chicago J Int Law. 2019;20(1):164-88.

[18] Allan T. Integrating the water-energy-food nexus into transboundary water governance: The case of the Nile Basin. IFPRI Project Brief. 2018.

[19] Zerai WG. Competing frames over the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam in the Egyptian and Ethiopian media. Front Commun. 2018.

[20] Swatuk LA. Water security in the Middle East: The hydro-politics of global solutions. Columbia International Affairs Online. 2005.

[21] Wolf AT. Water, conflict, and cooperation in the Middle East and North Africa. In: Water security. Palgrave Macmillan; 2012. p. 161-82.

[22] Warner JF. The watercourses convention, hydro-hegemony and transboundary water issues. Int Environ Agreem Polit Law Econ. 2014;16(2):223-36.

[23] Bassi AM. The conceptual socio-hydrological based framework for water, energy and food nexus. ResearchGate. 2017.

How to cite this paper

Contemporary Issues in Transboundary Water Management in Africa and the Middle East: Can There Be Sustainable Options to Address Power Imbalances?

How to cite this paper: U. J. Jimmy. (2025). Contemporary Issues in Transboundary Water Management in Africa and the Middle East: Can There Be Sustainable Options to Address Power Imbalances? Advance in Sustainability5(2), 76-85.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/as.2025.12.003