Published: October 31, 2025
Article history: Updated on June 26, 2026
Abstract
In the late 19th century, the Western missionary project in China faced a representational conundrum: how to depict a civilization whose gender norms it sought to both dismantle and comprehend. In 1889 and 1895, The Chinese Recorder and Missionary Journal published the first English translations of two founda-tional texts for women’s education, the Nǚ Ér Jīng (《女儿经》) and the Nǚ Lún Yǔ (《女论语》), by Mrs. A. S. Parker and Isaac Taylor Headland respectively. This paper reads these translations as a kind of competitive ethnography, and the tension between them exposes something deeper: a fundamental methodological split in the way the West produced knowledge about China. Headland pursued a romantic ethnography—he abstracted and aestheticized Chinese womanhood, turning it into a symbolic figure meant for scholarly consumption. It’s an approach that fits within Saidian Orientalism. Parker went the opposite way. Her realist ethnography zoomed in on the female body and its labor with invasive, almost forensic detail, deploying a disciplinary gaze squarely aimed at practical intervention. When the author compares how the two translators handle the body, labor, and materiality, it becomes clear that these were never complementary viewpoints. They were antagonistic projects. Yet, oddly, they converged in the larger Orientalist machinery that manufactured a usable “China” for the West. Drawing on recent conversations around missionary positionality and decolonial translation, this paper frames their work not as isolated cases but as episodes in a deeply contested history of cross-cultural interpretation.
References
Feng, J. C. (2025). New Chinese Bible translations and decolonialism/postcolonialism in the progress of the sinicization of Christianity. Journal of Research for Christianity in China, 24, 108-133.
https://doi.org/10.29635/JRCC.202506_(24).0004
Headland, I. T. (1895). The Nü Erh Ching; or Classic for Girls. The Chinese Recorder and Missionary Journal, 26, 150-157.
Liu, L. H. (1995). Translingual practice: Literature, national culture, and translated modernity—China, 1900-1937. Stanford University Press.
Liu, Y. F., & Wang, H. H. (2008). On the characteristic of The Female Analects and its diffusion of Confucianism. Hebei Academic Journal, 28(3), 46-49.
Parker, Mrs. A. S. (1889). Translation of the Nü Len Nü (女论语): Written by Song Zah-chao. The Chinese Recorder and Missionary Journal, 20, 554-560.
Said, E. W. (1978). Orientalism. Pantheon Books.
Scales, T. L. (2024). “I did not come to China for that!”: Intersections of mission work, marriage, and motherhood for Southern Baptist women in China at the turn of the 20th century. Religions, 15(8), 901.
https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15080901
Sun, S. (2001). The contradiction between The Analects on Women and the value inclination of its authors. Qilu Journal, 161(2), 34-37.
Wong, J. (2022). Significance of women’s involvement in re-translating the Chinese Bible. Parallèles, 34(1), 154-167. https://doi.org/10.17462/para.2022.01.13
Woo, T. (2002). The Nü-hsiao Ching: A handbook on self-cultivation for women. Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses, 31(2), 131-143.
Wu, H. L. (2024). BMS Serampore Mission and the beginning of the Chinese version of the Bible. Journal of Research for Christianity in China, 23, 120-157. https://doi.org/10.29635/JRCC.202412_(23).0005
Yang, X. L. (2025). ‘Revive, sisters!’: Chinese women in ministry through the lens of the Canaan Hymns. Missiology, 53(4), 423-433.
Yang, X. M. (2003). The Female Analects and the family ethical thought of intellectual women in the Late Tang Dynasty. Gansu Social Sciences, 2, 108-114.
Zhao, H. (2007). Viewing the culture of maternal instruction in the Tang Dynasty from the Classic of Filial Piety for Women and the Analects for Women. Literature Education, 10, 89-91.
Zhao, H. (2010). An exploration of the authors of The Female Analects—With also a brief account of the Song sisters’ deeds. Journal of Shihezi University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 24(3), 78-81.