References
Ahmad, J. (2019). Slowakische Republik (Slovak Republic) v. Achmea BV (C.J.E.U.). International Legal Materials, 58(5), 1101-1113.
Blanke, H. J., & Mangiamelli, S. (2021). Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. A commentary. Springer.
Boute, A. (2012). Case C-264/09, Commission v. Slovakia, Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 15 September 2011, Not Yet Reported (2012). Common Market Law Review, 49, 1179-1196.
Dashwood, A. (2022). Republic of Moldova v Komstroy LCC: Arbitration under Article 26 ECT outlawed in Intra-EU Disputes by Obiter Dictum. European Law Review, 2, 127-140.
Delhomme, V., & Larripa, L. (2018, November 22). C-416/18 Commission v France: Failure of a member State to fulfil its obligations under Article 267(3) TFEU. European Law Blog.
https://europeanlawblog.eu/2018/11/22/c-416-17-commission-v-france-failure-of-a-member-state-to-fulfil-its-obligations-under-Article-2673-tfeu/
Fanou, M. (2019). Intra-European Union investor-State arbitration post-Achmea: RIP? Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 26(2), 316-340.
Fitzmaurice, M., & Merkouris, P. (2020). Treaties in motion. The evolution of treaties from formation to termination. Cambridge University Press.
Galanis, A. (2023). (Real) concerns, coordination problems and, (im)possible solutions of the mechanism of the controversies in the accords of the EU law. Yearbook of European Union and Comparative Law (YEUCL), 2, 161-191.
Garcìa, R., & Ángel, J. (2022). El Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea reafirma su postura contra el arbitraje de inversiones intracomunitario: las sentencias Komstroy y PL Holdings tras la sentencia Achmea, in Arbitraje. Revista de Arbitraje Comercial y de Inversiones, 1, 127-141.
Giardina, A. (2011). La Question du Droit Applicable: l’Application Directe du Droit Européen et Son Influence sur le Droit et l’Arbitrage des Investissements. In C. Kassedjian (Ed.), Le Droit Européen et l’Arbitrage d’Investissement (pp. 150). Èditions Pantheòn.
Hollis, D. B. (2020). The Oxford guide to treaties. Oxford University Press.
Hope, J., Ivars, N., & Lazarchuk, K. (Vinge). (2024, May 1). Last gasps of Brexit: The CJEU holds that the UK breached EU law in a continuation of the Mocula saga. Kluwer Arbitration Blog.
https://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2024/05/01/last-gasps-of-brexit-the-cjeu-holds-that-the-uk-breached-eu-law-in-a-continuation-of-the-micula-saga/
Kellerbauer, M., Klamert, M., & Tomkin, J. (2024). Commentary on the European Union treaties and the Charter of fundamental rights. Oxford University Press.
Kochenov, D., & Lavranos, N. (2021). Achmea versus the rule of law: CJEU’s dogmatic dismissal of investors’ rights in backsliding member States of the European Union. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 14, 97.
Korom, V. (2022). Intra-EU BITs in Light of the Achmea Decision. Central European Journal of Comparative Law, 3(1), 98.
Liakopoulos, D. (2019). European integration through member states' constitutional identity in EU law. Maklu.
Liakopoulos, D. (2025). Legal certainty, flexibility and evolution of provisional application in international treaties. Eliva Press.
Northmore-Ball, L., Harvey, J., & Courtier, A. (2021). Micula v Romania: A saga of lasting significance. European Investment Law and Arbitration Review, 6, 76.
Paschalidis, P. (2022). Intra-EU Application of The Energy Charter Treaty: A Critical Analysis of The CJEU’s Ruling in Republic of Moldova. European Investment Law and Arbitration Review, 7(7), 17.
Pohl, J. H. (2018). Intra-EU Investment Arbitration After the Achmea Case: Legal Autonomy Bounded by Mutual Trust? European Constitutional Law Review, 14(4), 767-791.
Schwarze, J., Becker, V., Hatje, A., & Schoo, J. (2019). EU-Kommentar. Nomos.
Shipley, T. (2023, November 23). AG Emiliou’s Opinion in Commission v UK (C-516/22)-Did the UK Supreme Court infringe EU law? EU Law Live.
Simma, B. (1989). Bilateralism and Community Interest in the Law of state Responsibility. In Y. Dinstein & M. Tabory (Eds.), International Law at a Time of Perplexity: Essays in Honor of Shabtai Rosenne (pp. 821-822). Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Thierry, V. (2021, September 7). The CJEU ruling in Moldova v. Komstroy: The end of intra-EU investment arbitration under the Energy Charter Treaty (and a restrictive interpretation of the notion of protected investment. Kluwer Ar-bitration Blog.
https://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2021/09/07/cjeu-ruling-in-moldova-v-komstroy-the-end-of-intra-eu-invest-ment-arbitration-under-the-energy-charter-treaty-and-a-restrictive-interpretation-of-the-notion-of-protected-investment/
Tietje, C., & Wackernagel, C. (2015). Enforcement of Intra-EU ICSID Awards: Multilevel Governance, Investment Tribunals and the Lost Opportunity of the “Micula” Arbitration. Journal of World Investment and Trade, 16, 206.
Turmo, A. (2019). A Dialogue of Unequals-The European Court of Justice Reasserts National Courts’ Obligations under Article 267(3) TFEU: ECJ 4 October 2018, Case C-416/17, Commission v France. European Constitutional Law Review, 15(2), 340-358.
Zarra, G. (2014). The arbitrability of disputes arising from intra-EU BITs. American Review of International Arbitration, 25(3-4), 574.