Abstract
The present paper aims to investigate the negotiations, the practice, and the near future of the preliminary jurisdiction of the Court of Justice of the European Union to the Court by reaching the agreement published in the official journal and became operational from 1st September 2024. The work has been long for the institutions but not with many problems, perhaps because not all the issues in this regard are examined. A reform of the statute of the court is certainly important for the elements of a new discipline, that evaluates the precise impact of a continuous dialogue, that has been going on since the past between national and Kirchenberg judges. The future of the judicial system follows an important stage, therefore, that we are based on primary sources, on the jurisprudential practice as well as on some personal statements and perspectives that have to do with the future of this judicial path, that has not yet found a healthy effective path to solve all the related problems in this regard and especially of the preliminary reference.
References
Alberti, J. (2024). The Threshold Guardians. The Future of EU Agencies’ Boards of Appeal in light of the recent reform of CJEU Statute. Review of European Administrative Law, 67.
Bobek, M. (2023). Preliminary rulings before the General Court: what judicial architecture for the European Union?. Common Market Law Review, 60, 1515-ss.
Broberg, M. (2017). Preliminary References as a Means for Enforcing EU Law. In A. Jakab & D. Kochenov (eds.), The Enforcement of EU Law and Values: Ensuring Member States’ Compliance (pp. 99-ss). Oxford University Press.
Dashwood, A., & Johnston, A. (eds.). (2001). The Future of the Judicial System of the European Union. Hart Publishing.
Diniz Araùjo, L. H. (2020). Constitutional Law around the globe: judicial review in the United States and the “writ of certiorari”. Revista de Investigações Constitucionais, 7, 189.
Gentile, A. (2020). One year of filtering before the Court of Justice of the European Union. Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, 42(7), 4.
Gragl, P. (2013). (Judicial) love is not a one-way street: the EU preliminary reference procedure as a model for ECtHR advisory opinions under draft Protocol no.16. European Law Review, 2, 229.
Heffernan, L. (2003). The Community Courts Post-Nice: A European Certiorari Revisited. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 4, 908.
Kellerbauer, M., Klamert, M., & Tomkin, J. (2024). Commentary on the European Union treaties and the Charter of fundamental rights. Oxford University Press.
Liakopoulos, D. (2019). European integration through member states' constitutional identity in EU law. Maklu.
Orzan, M. (2020). Some remarks on the first applications of the filtering of certain categories of appeals before the Court of Justice. European Intellectual Property Review, 42(7), 426, 428-ss.
Sarmiento, D. (2023). On the road to a Constitutional Court of the European Union: the Court of Justice after the trans-fer of the preliminary reference jurisdiction to the General Court. Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy, 19, 7-ss.
Van Der Woude, M. (2021). The Place of the General Court in the Institutional Framework of the Union. EU Law Live, Weekend Edition, 81, 20, 26.