magazinelogo

Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Studies

ISSN Online: 3067-4972 Downloads: 4133 Total View: 31796
Frequency: Instant publication CODEN:
Email: JPBS@hillpublish.com
Article Open Access http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/jpbs.2025.12.003

Nobody Wants to be Good: An Ethological Background for Lévinas’s Ethics

Giovanni Martini

Pisa University, Pisa 56126, Italy.

*Corresponding author: Giovanni Martini 

Published: November 3,2025

Abstract

The title of this paper recalls a well-known statement by Emanuel Lévinas, to which we will return below. However, what does it mean to be good – to be a good friend, a good citizen, a good husband, etc.? Regardless of individual qualities, such as strength, intelligence, docility, or others, I believe that being good basically means conforming one's conduct to the fundamental rules that define social relationships in that particular social context. Obviously, this assertion needs to be deepened, if it is not to be resolved into a banal tautology. It is precisely with this in mind that I will begin my exposition by starting with a simple description of the systems of rules that govern human relationships. Secondly, I will attempt to set out some results achieved by comparative ethology in the field of social behaviour. I will finally attempt to place certain aspects of E. Lévinas's ethical thought against this briefly outlined background. This, in the convinction that the Lithuanian philosopher's words find accurate confirmation in the results of ethological research, and that the convergence of distant and independent points of view is an important validation of the reliability of the results.

Keywords

Others; Relationship; Responsibility; Ethics; Instinct

References

Brunori, A. (2024). Imputazione e colpa. L’invenzione della volontà. Quodlibet.

Corradini Broussard, D. (1993). Io sono, tu sei: dalla “caverna” di Platone alla “società civile” di Hegel. In G. M. Chiodi (Ed.), Miti simboli e politica. La contesa tra fratell I. Giappichelli. (My translation).

Davidson, D. (2001). Subjective, intersubjective, objective. Clarendon Press.

Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. (1996). Love and hate: On the natural history of basic behaviour patterns (G. Strachan, Trans.). Aldine de Gruyter.

Fassò, G. (2001). Storia della filosofia del diritto (Vol. 1). Laterza. (My translation).

Fornero G (2002). Lévinas dal medesimo all'altro. L'etica come filosofia prima (my trans.), UTET

Galanti Grollo, S. (2016). La fenomenologia e il debito. Passività e datità tra Husserl e Lévinas. Filosofia e Teologia, 2,. (My translation).

Lévinas, E. (1983). Difficile Liberté. Albin Michel.

Lévinas, E. (1984). Etica e Infinito. Dialoghi con Philippe Nemo (E. Baccarini, Trans.). Città Nuova.

Lévinas, E. (1998). Of God who comes to mind (B. Bergo, Trans.). Stanford University Press.

Lévinas, E. (2003). Totality and infinity: An essay on exteriority. Duquesne University Press.

Lévinas, E. (2006). Humanism of the other (N. Poller, Trans.). University of Illinois Press.

Lévinas, E. (2011). Otherwise than being or beyond essence (A. Lingis, Trans.). Duquesne University Press.

Lorenz, K. (1974). Civilized man's eight deadly sins. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

Lorenz, K. (1978). Behind the mirror: A search for a natural history of human knowledge (R. Taylor, Trans.). Har-vest/HBJ Books.

Lorenz, K. (1987). The waning of humaneness (R. Warren Kickert, Trans.). Little Brown & Co.

Lorenz, K. (2002). On aggression (M. Kerr Wilson, Trans.). Routledge.

Moltmann, J. (1993). God in creation: A new theology of creation and the spirit of God (M. Kohl, Trans.). Fortress Press.

Mortati C. (1969). Istituzioni di diritto pubblico (my trans.), CEDAM

Mura, G. (1984). La provocazione etica di Emmanuel Lévinas. In E. Lévinas, Etica e Infinito. Dialoghi con Philippe Nemo (E. Baccarini, Trans.). Città Nuova.

How to cite this paper

Nobody Wants to be Good: An Ethological Background for Lévinas's Ethics

How to cite this paper: Giovanni Martini. (2025). Nobody Wants to be Good: An Ethological Background for Lévinas's Ethics. Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Studies1(2), 69-81.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/jpbs.2025.12.003