magazinelogo

International Journal of Food Science and Agriculture

ISSN Print: 2578-3467 Downloads: 187870 Total View: 2769785
Frequency: quarterly ISSN Online: 2578-3475 CODEN: IJFSJ3
Email: ijfsa@hillpublisher.com
Article http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/ijfsa.2021.03.018

Nature of Dadon and Its Effect on Livelihood Status of Two Fishing Communities in Kishoreganj Haor of Bangladesh

A. K. M. Nowsad Alam, Md. Khaled Rahman*, M. U. M. Abu Zakaria, Al-Shahriar, Fanindra Chandra Sarker

Department of Fisheries Technology, Faculty of Fisheries, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh-2202, Bangladesh.

*Corresponding author: Md. Khaled Rahman

Published: March 10,2021

Abstract

To assess the nature and effect of dadon (a non-institutional financing way, built upon a verbal contract between the fishers and the money lenders/mohajons, which is paid back by harvested fish at predetermined lower price, along with 5-10% cash interest) on livelihood status of two fishing communities in Kishoreganj haor, a 12-month study was conducted among the 6 fish landing centers (FLC) under 5 haor upazilas of Kishoreganj district of Bangladesh, viz., Chamra Ghat Matshaya Arat of Karimganj Upazila, Chouganga Matshaya Arat of Itna Upazila, Tarail Matshaya Arat of Tarail Upazila, Korgaon bazar Matshaya Arat of Kotiadi upazila, Nikli Notun Bazar Matshaya Arat and Rodar Podda Matshaya Arat of Nikli Upazila, from August 2018 to July 2019. One hundred twenty interviewees, of which 60 fishermen from dadon receiver (DR) and 60 from dadon non-receiver (DnR), were randomly selected from 6 landing centers by using pre-tested questionnaire interview and focus group discussion to collect empirical data. Results revealed that, about 50% fishermen received dadon, of which 42% took dadon from aratder, 4% from mahajon and 4% from the relatives or friends. The rate of commission in arat was comparatively lower than the other credit sources. The commission rate taken by aratdar was higher in DR (5.9-8.5%) compared to DnR (3.9-5.69%). In addition, about 2.81%-3.6% and 1.69%-3% extra commission was taken from DR and DnR, respectively by the people of aratdar during auction of fish. Results revealed that dadon was taken for both fishing purposes (56.83%) and household purposes (43.17%) and most of the dadon (58%) was repaid by the beginning of next fishing season. There was no difference of commission observed due to species, size and quality of fish between DR and DnR fishermen. Monthly income and annual savings were comparatively higher in DR fishermen than DnR fishermen. Educational status was comparatively better in DR fishermen than DnR fishermen (p<0.05). Total land and homestead area, electricity, kitchen and sanitation facilities, as well as home condition were comparatively better in DR fishermen compared to DnR fishermen (p<0.05). On the other hand, livelihood improvement status, as perceived by the fishermen, was better in DnR compared to DR fishermen (p<0.05). Mobility and ability to make small purchase of women were comparatively better in DnR household than DR (p<0.05). However, in terms of family decision making for children education, treatment and marriage and economic security, the women from DR fishermen were better empowered. Overall, the DR fishermen were found to led comparative better life than DnR fishermen.

References

[1] Habib, I. (1964). Usury in medieval India. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 6(4): 393-419.

[2] Bhattacharya, S. (1982). Regional Economy (1757-1857): Eastern India, Kumar, D. (Ed.), The Cambridge Economic History of India, 2: 270-332.

[3] Raychaudhuri, T. (1982). Non-Agricultural Production: Mughal India. The Cambridge Economic History of India, 1: 261-307.

[4] BBS (Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics). (2014). Rural Credit Survey, 2014, Statistics and Informatics Division, Ministry of Planning, Bangladesh. P. 4.

[5] Habib, A. (2001). Delipara: an obscure fishing village of Bangladesh. Community Development Centre, Chittagong, Bangladesh.

[6] Kleih, U., Alam, K., Dastidar, R., Dutta, U., Oudwater, N., and Ward A. (2003). Livelihoods in coastal fishing communities, and the marine fish marketing system of Bangladesh. National Resources Institute (NRI), Greenwich University, London, NRI 2712, p. 81.

[7] Nowsad, A. K. M. A. (2013). Post-harvest fisheries management- The Final Report submitted to the Supply Chain Development Component (SCDC) of NATP, Hortex Foundation, p. 76.

[8] Crow, B. and Murshid, K. A. S. (1992). The finance of trade and agriculture in a backward area of Bangladesh. The European Journal of Development Research, 4(2): 36-60.

[9] Islam, M. M., Islam, N., Sunny, A. R., Jentoft, S., Ullah, M. H., and Sharifuzzaman, S. M. (2016). Fishers’ perceptions of the performance of hilsa shad (Tenualosa ilisha) sanctuaries in Bangladesh. Ocean & Coastal Management, 130: 309-316.

[10] Chowdhury, A. J. (2012). Investigation on livelihood status of hilsa fishing communities in Lakshmipur district. M.Sc. Thesis, Department of Fisheries Management, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh.

[11] Khair, M. A. (2005). Study on the livelihood strategies of Parkibazar Fisher community, Anwara, Chittagong. M.Sc. Thesis, Institute of Marine Sciences & Fisheries, University of Chittagong, Bangladesh.

[12] Nowsad, A. K. M. A. (2010). Post-harvest loss reduction in fisheries in Bangladesh: a way forward to food security. Final report PR, 5(8): 171.

[13] Ahmed, M., Islam, M. N., and Shamsuddoha, M. (2007). Value chain analysis in the dry fish production and marketing of post-harvest fishery products (PHFP) in the Coastal Belt of Bangladesh. Journal of Bangladesh Fisheries Research Forum, pp. 87-112.

[14] Ali, M. L. (2014). Fishers’ access to fisheries resources under different management systems and their livelihood issues. Recent Advances in Fisheries of Bangladesh, 1: 161-180.

[15] Ferdoushi, Z. and Xiang-guo, Z. (2010). Mud crab (Scylla serrata) fattening in Bangladesh: present status and future prospects. Recent Advances in Fisheries of Bangladesh, 1: 191-202.

[16] BBS (Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics). (2017). Preliminary Report on the Household Income and Expenditure Survey (HIES), 2016, Dhaka: Planning Division, Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh. P. 48.

[17] Ali, H., Azad, M. A. K., Anisuzzaman, M., Chowdhury, M. M. R., Hoque, M., and Sharful, M. I. (2009). Livelihood status of the fish farmers in some selected areas of Tarakanda upazila of Mymensingh district. Journal of Agroforestry and Environment, 3(2): 85-89.

[18] Sufian, M. A., Kunda, M., Islam, M. J., Haque, A. T. U., and Pandit, D. (2017). Socio-economic conditions of fishermen of dekar haor in Sunamganj. Journal of Sylhet Agricultural University, 4(1): 101-109.

[19] Alam, M. F. and Bashar, M. A. (1995). Structure of cost and profitability of small scale riverine fishing in Bangladesh. Journal of Research Progress, 9: 235-241.

[20] BBS (Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics). (2019). Bangladesh Sample Vital Statistics 2018, Statistics and Informatics Division, Ministry of Planning, Bangladesh, p. 155.

[21] Trina, B. D., Roy, N. C., Das, S. K., and Ferdausi, H. J. (2015). Socio-economic status of fishers’ community at Dekhar haor in Sunamganj district of Bangladesh. Journal of the Sylhet Agricultural University, 2(2): 239-24.

[22] Kabir, M. A. (2007). Study on the livelihood strategies of Monoharkhali Fisher community, Patharghata, Chittagong, M.Sc. Thesis, Institute of Marine Sciences and Fisheries, University of Chittagong, Bangladesh.

[23] Kazal, M. M. H., Villinueva, C. C., Hossain, M. Z. and Das, T. K. (2010). Food security strategies of the people living in haor areas: status and prospects. American International University, Dhaka, Bangladesh. NFPCSP Final Report, National Food Policy Capacity Strengthening Program, Ministry of Food, Dhaka.

[24] CDSP. (2012). Baseline survey 2011 (Technical report No. 1), Char Development and Settlement Project, Phase IV, Bangladesh, p. 60.

[25] Islam, M. M. (2011). Living on the margin: the poverty-vulnerability nexus in the small-scale fisheries of Bangladesh. In Poverty mosaics: Realities and prospects in small-scale fisheries, Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 71-95.

How to cite this paper

Nature of Dadon and Its Effect on Livelihood Status of Two Fishing Communities in Kishoreganj Haor of Bangladesh

How to cite this paper: A. K. M. Nowsad Alam, Md. Khaled Rahman, M. U. M. Abu Zakaria, Al-Shahriar, Fanindra Chandra Sarker. (2021) Nature of Dadon and Its Effect on Livelihood Status of Two Fishing Communities in Kishoreganj Haor of Bangladesh. International Journal of Food Science and Agriculture5(1), 140-151.

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.26855/ijfsa.2021.03.018