Abstract
This study presents a contrastive analysis of teacher-student interaction patterns in Spanish language classrooms at the University of Alcalá in Spain and Fujian Normal University in China, examining how cultural values influence pedagogical behavior and language output. Drawing on Hofstede’s cultural dimensions theory and the IRF (Initiation-Response-Feedback) model, the research adopts a mixed-methods approach, including classroom observations, language assessments, and interviews with teachers and students. The findings reveal that Spanish classrooms emphasize open-ended questioning (72%) and immediate correction (88%), fostering egalitarian dialogue and resulting in higher oral fluency (120 words per minute), but also a higher grammatical error rate (2.5 errors per minute). In contrast, Chinese classrooms prioritize closed-ended questions (65%) and delayed feedback (70%), shaped by high power distance (PDI=80) and collectivism. Students in these settings spoke less frequently (85 words per minute) but demonstrated greater grammatical accuracy (1.2 errors per minute). The study shows that Spain’s lower power distance (PDI=31) and individualism (IDV=51) promote active student participation, while Chinese students tend to avoid immediate correction due to face-saving concerns. The research offers cross-cultural pedagogical recommendations: phased feedback in Spanish classrooms to balance fluency and accuracy, and gradual introduction of open interaction in Chinese classrooms. Ultimately, the study confirms the deep influence of cultural values on instructional behavior, providing both theoretical insight and practical guidance for globalized language education.
References
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Dewaele, J.-M. (2022). How to deal with foreign language anxiety. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 43(4), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2022.2047192
Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Hu, G. (2002). Cultural influences on Chinese language classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 36(4), 459-467.
https://doi.org/10.2307/3588232
Kim, Y. Y. (2023). Revisiting cross-cultural adaptation: Stress-adaptation-growth dynamics in a hyperconnected world. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 92, 101768.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2022.101768
Lieberman, M. D., & Amaya-Jackson, L. (2005). The impact of structured feedback on language anxiety: A cross-cultural intervention study. Language Teaching Research, 9(4), 365-382. https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168805lr173oa
Woodrow, L. (2006). Anxiety and speaking English as a second language. RELC Journal, 37(3), 308-328.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688206071315
Zhang, H., & Beck, J. (2022). Second language anxiety and intercultural adjustment among international students in online learning during COVID-19. System, 107, 102789.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102789
How to cite this paper
A Contrastive Study of Teacher-Student Interaction Patterns in Spanish Classrooms Between Chinese and Spanish Universities—An Empirical Analysis Based on the University of Alcalá and Fujian Normal University
How to cite this paper: Zhenying Fu. (2025). A Contrastive Study of Teacher-Student Interaction Patterns in Spanish Classrooms Between Chinese and Spanish Universities—An Empirical Analysis Based on the University of Alcalá and Fujian Normal University. The Educational Review, USA, 9(4), 448-453.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/er.2025.04.009