magazinelogo

Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Science

ISSN Online: 2576-0548 Downloads: 581790 Total View: 4227381
Frequency: monthly ISSN Print: 2576-0556 CODEN: JHASAY
Email: jhass@hillpublisher.com
Article Open Access http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/jhass.2025.03.040

Quantitative Evaluation of Different Incentive Needs of Different Generations of Employees and Design of Differentiated Incentive Countermeasures

Li Nie

Lyceum of the Philippines University, Manila 1002, Philippines.

*Corresponding author: Li Nie

Published: April 16,2025

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore the differences in motivation needs of employees of different generations, and to propose differentiated incentive countermeasures through quantitative evaluation and simulation experiments. Based on the sample data of Gen X, millennials and Gen Z, and combined with the indicators of employee incentive satisfaction, work efficiency, performance and teamwork, I analyze the performance differences in traditional (salary and stability), flexible (career development and autonomy) and innovative (challenge and social value) incentive situations. The experimental results show that Gen Z's performance efficiency (92% vs. 90%) and teamwork scores (87.7) are significantly higher in the flexible type (satisfaction 4.8) and innovative motivation (satisfaction 4.6), indicating that they attach importance to innovation, flexibility and social value; Millennials prefer flexible incentives (4.4 satisfaction) and 85% performance efficiency. Generation X had the highest levels of satisfaction (4.2) and productivity (78%) with traditional incentives, but was less able to work in teams (score 71). Research shows that generational differences have a significant impact on employee motivation needs and team effectiveness. Enterprises need to design differentiated incentive strategies according to different generational characteristics, such as providing innovative platforms and flexible working modes for Generation Z and strengthening stability guarantees for Generation X, so as to improve the overall organizational effectiveness. This study provides the theoretical basis and practical guidance for multi-generation employee management, and helps enterprises optimize incentive mechanisms and enhance competitiveness.

References

Business Administration. (2023). Research on core employee motivation in J Company based on two-factor theory.

Children and Children in Broad Sense. (2021). The quantitative positioning and choice of performance appraisal. China Circulation Economy, 5, 108-112.

Lin, F. (2022). Analysis on the characteristics and effective motivation factors of new generation employees. Human Resources Development, (9), 79-81.

Liu, C. (2015). An empirical study on intergenerational differences in employee motivation satisfaction. Journal of Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, 10(4), 6.

Niu, Y. (2024). Difficulties and countermeasures in performance appraisal management of public institutions. China Economic and Trade, (26), 192-194.

Research on flexible retirement incentive mechanism based on intergenerational equity. (2022). Financial Science, (6), 150-159.

Zhang, H. (2024). Training plan and comprehensive application of quantitative points system for young employees. Microcomputer, (10), 175-177.

Zhu, G. (2018). Intergenerational characteristics, performance and motivation strategies of "post-90s" employees. Leadership Science, (32), 2.

How to cite this paper

Quantitative Evaluation of Different Incentive Needs of Different Generations of Employees and Design of Differentiated Incentive Countermeasures

How to cite this paper: Li Nie. (2025) Quantitative Evaluation of Different Incentive Needs of Different Generations of Employees and Design of Differentiated Incentive Countermeasures. Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Science9(3), 621-626.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/jhass.2025.03.040