References
Aiken, L. S., West, S. G., & Reno, R. R. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage.
Alperovych, Y., Huebner, G., & Lobet, F. (2015). How does governmental versus private venture capital backing affect a firm’s efficiency? Evidence from Belgium. Journal of Business Venturing, 30, 508-525.
Armanios, D. E., Eesley, C. E., Li, J., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2017). How entrepreneurs leverage institutional intermediaries in emerging economies to acquire public resources. Strategic Management Journal, 38, 1373-1390.
Baron, R. A., & Ensley, M. D. (2006). Opportunity recognition as the detection of meaningful patterns: Evidence from comparisons of novice and experienced entrepreneurs. Management Science, 52, 1331-1344.
Beggs, A., & Graddy, K. (2009). Anchoring effects: Evidence from art auctions. American Economic Review, 99, 1027-1039.
Bertoni, F., & Tykvová, T. (2015). Does governmental venture capital spur invention and innovation? Evidence from young European biotech companies. Research Policy, 44, 925-935.
Boeing, P. (2016). The allocation and effectiveness of China’s R&D subsidies—Evidence from listed firms. Research Policy, 45, 1774-1789.
Bronzini, R., & Piselli, P. (2016). The impact of R&D subsidies on firm innovation. Research Policy, 45, 442-457.
Carroll, R. J. (2017). Transformation and weighting in regression. Routledge.
Cobb, J. A., Wry, T., & Zhao, E. Y. (2016). Funding financial inclusion: Institutional logics and the contextual contingency of funding for microfinance organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 59, 2103-2131.
Colombo, M. G., Cumming, D. J., & Vismara, S. (2016). Governmental venture capital for innovative young firms. Journal of Technology Transfer, 41, 10-24.
Corrado, C. A., & Hulten, C. R. (2010). How do you measure a “technological revolution”? American Economic Review, 100, 99-104.
Criscuolo, P., Dahlander, L., Grohsjean, T., & Salter, A. (2017). Evaluating novelty: The role of panels in the selection of R&D projects. Academy of Management Journal, 60, 433-460.
Cumming, D., & Johan, S. (2017). The problems with and promise of entrepreneurial finance. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 11, 357-370.
Dimos, C., & Pugh, G. (2016). The effectiveness of R&D subsidies: A meta-regression analysis of the evaluation literature. Research Policy, 45, 797-815.
Ecken, P., & Pibernik, R. (2016). Hit or miss: What leads experts to take advice for long-term judgments? Management Science, 62, 2002-2021.
Epley, N., & Gilovich, T. (2006). The anchoring-and-adjustment heuristic. Psychological Science, 17, 311-318.
Foray, D., Mowery, D. C., & Nelson, R. R. (2012). Public R&D and social challenges: What lessons from mission R&D programs? Research Policy, 41, 1697-1702.
Franke, N., Gruber, M., Harhoff, D., & Henkel, J. (2008). Venture capitalists’ evaluations of start-up teams: Trade-offs, knock-out criteria, and the impact of VC experience. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32, 459-483.
Friedland, R., & Alford, R. R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices and institutional contradictions.
Gruber, M., Kim, S. M., & Brinckmann, J. (2015). What is an attractive business opportunity? An empirical study of opportunity evaluation decisions by technologists, managers, and entrepreneurs. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 9, 205-225.
Guerini, M., & Quas, A. (2016). Governmental venture capital in Europe: Screening and certification. Journal of Business Venturing, 31, 175-195.
Haltiwanger, J., Jarmin, R. S., & Miranda, J. (2012). Who Creates Jobs? Small versus Large versus Young. Review of Economics and Statistics, 95, 347-361.
Haltiwanger, J., Jarmin, R. S., Kulick, R. B., & Miranda, J. (2016). High Growth Young Firms: Contribution to Job, Output and Productivity Growth (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 2866566). Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Net-work.
Harrison, R. T., & Mason, C. M. (2017). Backing the horse or the jockey? Due diligence, agency costs, information and the evaluation of risk by business angel investors. International Review of Entrepreneurship, 15, 269-290.
Hart, O. (1995). Firms, contracts, and financial structure. Clarendon Press.
Henke, C. R. (2022). Social science for what?: Battles over public funding for the “other sciences” at the national science foundation by mark solovey. American Journal of Sociology, 127, 1411-1413.
Hoetker, G. (2007). The use of logit and probit models in strategic management research: Critical issues. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 331-343.
Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2015). The impact of corporate social responsibility on investment recommendations: Analysts’ perceptions and shifting institutional logics. Strategic Management Journal, 36, 1053-1081.
Jourdan, J., & Kivleniece, I. (2016). Too much of a good thing? The dual effect of public sponsorship on organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal, 60, 55-77.
Kapoor, R., & Furr, N. R. (2015). Complementarities and competition: Unpacking the drivers of entrants’ technology choices in the solar photovoltaic industry. Strategic Management Journal, 36, 416-436.
Kolympiris, C., Kalaitzandonakes, N., & Miller, D. (2014). Public funds and local biotechnology firm creation. Research Policy, 43, 121-137.
Lerner, J. (2010). The future of public efforts to boost entrepreneurship and venture capital. Small Business Economics, 35, 255-264.
Liu, T., Mao, Y., & Tian, X. (2017). The role of human capital: Evidence from patent generation. Kelley School of Business Research Paper.
Lo, J. Y., & Li, H. (2018). In the eyes of the beholder: The effect of participant diversity on perceived merits of collaborative innovations. Research Policy, 47, 1229-1242.
Maitland, E., & Sammartino, A. (2015). Decision making and uncertainty: The role of heuristics and experience in assessing a politically hazardous environment. Strategic Management Journal, 36, 1554-1578.
Mitchell, J. R., Shepherd, D. A., & Sharfman, M. P. (2011). Erratic strategic decisions: When and why managers are inconsistent in strategic decision making. Strategic Management Journal, 32, 683-704.
Mitteness, C., Baucus, M. S., & Sudek, R. (2012). Horse vs. Jockey? How stage of funding process and industry experience affect the evaluations of angel investors. Venture Capital, 14, 241-267.
Mitteness, C., Sudek, R., & Cardon, M. S. (2012). Angel investor characteristics that determine whether perceived passion leads to higher evaluations of funding potential. Journal of Business Venturing, 27, 592-606.
Mollick, E., & Nanda, R. (2016). Wisdom or madness? Comparing crowds with expert evaluation in funding the arts. Management Science, 62, 1533-1553.
Murnieks, C. Y., Haynie, J. M., Wiltbank, R. E., & Harting, T. (2011). ‘I like how you think’: Similarity as an interaction bias in the investor-entrepreneur dyad. Journal of Management Studies, 48, 1533-1561.
Mussweiler, T., Strack, F., & Pfeiffer, T. (2000). Overcoming the inevitable anchoring effect: Considering the opposite compensates for selective accessibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1142-1150.
Oehmichen, J., Schrapp, S., & Wolff, M. (2017). Who needs experts most? Board industry expertise and strategic change-a contingency perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 38, 645-656.
Pahnke, E. C., Katila, R., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2015). Who takes you to the dance? How partners’ institutional logics influence innovation in young firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 60, 596-633.
Patel, P. C., & Wolfe, M. T. (2021). In the eye of the beholder? The returns to beauty and IQ for the self‐employed. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 15, 487-525.
Rathje, J. M., & Katila, R. (2018). Outcomes from institutional interactions: Does government funding help firm innova-tion? Academy of Management Proceedings, 2018, 14701.
Shepherd, D. A., Zacharakis, A., & Baron, R. A. (2003). VCs’ decision processes: Evidence suggesting more experience may not always be better. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 381-401.
Sitruk, J., Grodal, S., Suarez, F., & Dibiaggio, L. (2025). Emotional brightness and crowdfunding performance. Research Policy, 54, 105094.
Svetek, M., & Drnovšek, M. (2022). The jockey on the horse: What makes a winning ride in the eyes of early-stage investors? Small Enterprise Research, 29, 165-189.
Takalo, T., & Tanayama, T. (2010). Adverse selection and financing of innovation: Is there a need for R&D subsidies? Journal of Technology Transfer, 35, 16-41.
Tata, A., & Niedworok, A. (2018). Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? An empirical study of how entrepreneurs, managers, and investors evaluate business opportunities at the earliest stages. Venture Capital, 1-34.
Thaler, R. H., & Johnson, E. J. (1990). Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: The effects of prior outcomes on risky choice. Management Science, 36, 643-660.
Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure, and process. Oxford University Press on Demand.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453-458.
Wang, Y., Li, J., & Furman, J. L. (2017). Firm performance and state innovation funding: Evidence from China’s Innofund program. Research Policy, 46, 1142-1161.
Wang, Y., Siegel, J., & Li, J. (2024). Who captures the state? Evidence from irregular awards in a public innovation grant program. Strategic Management Journal, 45, 2420-2458.
Zelner, B. A. (2009). Using simulation to interpret results from logit, probit, and other nonlinear models. Strategic Management Journal, 30, 1335-1348.
Zhou, J., Li, J., Jiao, H., Qiu, H., & Liu, Z. (2020). The more funding the better? The moderating role of knowledge stock on the effects of different government-funded research projects on firm innovation in Chinese cultural and creative industries. Technovation, 92-93, 102059.
Zhou, J., Wang, X. M., Bavato, D., Tasselli, S., & Wu, J. (2019). Understanding the receiving side of creativity: A multi-disciplinary review and implications for management research. Journal of Management, 45, 2570-2595.