References
Cramer, K., Post, T., & Currier, S. (1993). Learning and teaching ratio and proportion: Research implications. In D. T. Owens (Ed.), Research ideas for the classroom: Middle grades mathematics (pp. 159-178). New York: Macmillan.
De Bock, D., Van Dooren, W., & Verschaffel, L. (2011). Students’ overuse of linearity: An exploration in physics. Research in Science Education, 41(3), 389-412. doi: 10.1007/s11165-010-9171-8.
De Bock, D., Van Dooren, W., Janssens, D., & Verschaffel, L. (2002). Improper use of linear reasoning: An in-depth study of the nature and the irresistibility of secondary school students’ errors. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 50(3), 311-334.
De Bock, D., Van Dooren, W., Janssens, D., & Verschaffel, L. (2007). The illusion of linearity: From analysis to improvement. Springer.
Dragone, L., Temperman, G., & de Lievre, B. (2022). Teachıng proportıonalıty: Teachers'conceptıons and reported practıces. Annals of the University of Craiova, Series Psychology, Pedagogy, 44(2), 7-20.
Dragone, L., Temperman, G., De Lièvre, B. (2020). Effects of the association of registers of semiotic representation on the solution of problems of direct proportionality. Review of Science, Mathematics and ICT Education, 14(1), 89-111.
Duma, L. (2021). The groundless use of linearity in daily thinking and decision-making. Periodica Polytechnica Social and Management Sciences, 29(2), 125-135.
Fernandez, C., Llinares, S., & Valls, J. (2013). Primary school teachers notice students’ mathematical thinking in problem solving. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 10(1), 441-468.
Fernandez, C., Llinares, S., Modestou, M., & Gagatsis, A. (2010). Proportional reasoning: How task variables influence the development of students’ strategies from primary to secondary school. Mathematics Issue, 10(1), 1-18.
Fischbein, E. (1999). Intuitions and schemata in mathematical reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 38(1), 11-50.
González-Polo, R. I., & Castaneda, A. (2024). Progressive mathematics of functions in secondary school students using a free-fall activity. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 19(1), em0765.
Greer, B. (1987). Understanding of arithmetical operations as models of situations. In J. A. Sloboda & D. Rogers (Eds.), Cognitive processes in mathematics (pp. 60-80). Oxford, United Kingdom: Clarendon.
Jupri, A., Usdiyana, D., & Gozali, S. M. (2024). Teaching and learning processes for pre-service mathematics teachers: The case of systems of equations. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(8), em2482.
Knox, L. B. (2017). Improving Students' Proportional Reasoning Ability in the Context of Algebra I (Doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh).
Lambrecht, P. (2016). Engineering for the study of proportionality and nonproportionality in early secondary education. Thesis from the University of Namur.
Leinhardt, G., Zaslavsky, O., & Stein, M. K. (1990). Functions, graphs, and graphing: Tasks, learning, and teaching. Review of Educational Research, 60(1), 1-64.
Matz, M. (1982). Towards a process model for high school algebra errors. In D. Sleeman & J. S. Brown (Eds.), Intelligent tutoring systems (pp. 25-50). London: Academic Press.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
Noelting, G. (1980). The development of proportional reasoning and the ratio concept. Part 1-differentiation of stages. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 11(1), 217-253.
Risma, D. A. (2014). Can remedyıng ınduce conceptual change ın students’mısconceptıon of lınearıty? PYTHAGORAS: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2).
Roblin, L. (2015). Proportionality in fifth grade. Dissertation from the University of Orleans.
Van den Brink, J., & Streefland, L. (1979). Young children (6-8)—ratio and proportion. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 10(1), 403-420.
Van Dooren, W., De Bock, D., & Verschaffel, L. (2015). The linear imperative: Why students overuse linearity. In E. A. Silver, & P. A. Kenney (Eds.), More lessons learned from research, Volume 1: Useful and usable research related to core mathematical practices (pp. 93-105). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Van Dooren, W., De Bock, D., Depaepe, F., Janssens, D., & Verschaffel, L. (2003). The illusion of linearity: Expanding the evidence towards probabilistic reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 53(1), 113-138.
Van Dooren, W., De Bock, D., Hessels, A., Janssens, D., & Verschaffel, L. (2005). Not everything is proportional: Effect of age and problem type on propensities of overgeneralization. Cognition and Instruction, 23(1), 57-86.
Van Dooren, W., De Bock, D., Hessels, A., Janssens, D., & Verschaffel, L. (2004). Remedying secondary school students' illusion of linearity: A teaching experiment aiming at conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 14(5), 485-501.
Van Dooren, W., De Bock, D., Janssens, D., & Verschaffel, L. (2007). Students' over-reliance on linear methods: A scholastic effect? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(2), 307-321.
Van Dooren, W., De Bock, D., Janssens, D., & Verschaffel, L. (2008). The linear imperative: An inventory and conceptual analysis of students' overuse of linearity. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(3), 311-342.
Van Dooren, W., De Bock, D., Van Reeth, D., & Minne, J. (2014). Students’ overreliance on linearity in economic thinking: An exploratory study at the tertiary level. International Review of Economics Education, 16(1), 1-31.
Retrieved from: https://lirias.kuleuven.be/bitstream/123456789/407597/1/13HRP01.pdf.
Van Dooren, W., De Bock, D., Vleugels, K., & Verschaffel, L. (2010). Just answering . . . or thinking? Contrasting pupils’ solutions and classifications of missing-value word problems. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 12(1), 20-35.
Verschaffel, L., Greer, B., & De Corte, E. (2000). Making sense of word problems. Lisse, Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.