ArticleOpen Access http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/ftair.2024.12.005
Definition and Protection of the Legal Attributes of AI Creations
Yuxing Tang, Yiping Cheng*
Zhejiang Yuanxin Law Firm, Lishui 323050, Zhejiang, China.
*Corresponding author: Yiping Cheng
Published: November 18,2024
Abstract
With the rapid development of artificial intelligence in recent years, AI creations have appeared more frequently and have specific meanings. Among the many theories in comparative law theory, except for the more reasonable theory of interest, the theory of works and other non-work theories all have certain shortcomings. Weighing the pros and cons and choosing the best, AI creations can be defined as a special kind of statutory interest. Within the framework of the theory of interest, reasonable protection of AI creations can still be achieved through restrictive interpretation of transaction practices, establishment of an express system for AI creations, reasonable balance and utilization of the public interests involved, and exploration of a scientific and reasonable interest balance mechanism.
Keywords
Artificial intelligence; creation; legal attributes; definition and protection
References
[1] Yu Xingzhong. Artificial Intelligence, Discourse Theory and Refutable Reasoning. Edited by Ge Hongyi. Legal Methods and Legal Thinking (3rd Edition) [M]. Beijing: China University of Political Science and Law Press. 2005: 118.
[2] Guo Ruyuan. On the protection of information rights in content generated by artificial intelligence [J]. Intellectual Property. 2020(2):48.
[3] Liu Ying, He Danxi. On the patentability of artificial intelligence products [J]. Technology and Law. 2019(4):7.
[4] Hu Guang. Discussion on the basic theory of copyright law for objects generated by artificial intelligence: history, present and future [J]. Contemporary Communication. 2018(4):80-90.
[5] Sun Shan. Dilemmas and solutions for copyright protection of artificial intelligence-generated content [J]. Intellectual Property. 2018(11):60-65.
[6] Yi Jiming. Are artificial intelligence creations works? [J]. Legal Science (Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law). 2017(5):139.
[7] Huang Hui, Huang Jie. The rationality of artificial intelligence “creations” being regarded as works for protection [J]. Jiangxi Social Sciences. 2019(2):33-42.
[8] Ji Lianshuai, He Ying. Research on copyright ownership of artificial intelligence creations[J]. Learning and Exploration. 2018(10):106-110.
[9] Cong Lixian. Copyrightability and ownership of AI-generated content[J]. China Publishing. 2019(1):11-14.
[10] Feng Gang. A preliminary study on the legal protection path of AI-generated content[J]. China Publishing. 2019(1):5-10.
[11] Huang Yuye, Sima Hang. Ownership of works generated by artificial intelligence from the perspective of interest[J]. Journal of Henan Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition). 2018(4):23-29.
How to cite this paper
Definition and Protection of the Legal Attributes of AI Creations
How to cite this paper: Yuxing Tang, Yiping Cheng. (2024) Definition and Protection of the Legal Attributes of AI Creations. Future Trends in AI Research, 1(1), 17-20.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/ftair.2024.12.005