magazinelogo

Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Science

ISSN Print: 2576-0556 Downloads: 411824 Total View: 3301468
Frequency: monthly ISSN Online: 2576-0548 CODEN: JHASAY
Email: jhass@hillpublisher.com
Article http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/jhass.2024.10.020

The Design Philosophy of Symbiosis of All Things: Cross-border Experimental Creation and Reflection on Contemporary Ceramics

Guanqing Hua1,*, Ling Zheng2

1School of Arts, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China.

2Chongqing Polytechnic University of Electronic Technology, Chongqing 401333, China.

*Corresponding author: Guanqing Hua

Published: November 8,2024

Abstract

Research has shown that "human-centered" design methods can effectively create product functions and evoke emotions that resonate with users, thereby enhancing their satisfaction with the products. However, it remains challenging to stimulate users' perceptual thinking and to improve the interaction and social cohesion between users and the products. The emergence of these challenges undoubtedly highlights the limitations of traditional design methods that rely solely on human needs as the criterion for value judgment. This paper posits that design cannot be accomplished by humans alone. Surrounding materials, tools, objects, and natural elements all possess subjective agency and collaborate with humans to bring artworks into existence. Understanding and guiding design practice from the perspective of a "symbiosis of all things" does not diminish human subjectivity and life experience; rather, it emphasizes the interconnection and symbiosis among all entities. The design concept of the symbiosis of all things can provide a sustainable framework for addressing the ecological crisis faced during the Anthropocene.

References

Bryant, Levi R. (2011). The Democracy of Objects. Ann Arbor: Open Humanities Press, 2011: 40.

Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5-21.

Chapman, J. (2009). Design for (emotional) durability. Design Issues, 25(4), 29-35.

Chen Yongqun, Gan Chongping, Ni Yanjun, et al. (2010). Italian designer Odo Sibik. Shanghai: Tongji University Press. P. 67.

De Castro, E V. (1998). Cosmological deixis and Amerindian perspectivism. Journal of the Royal anthropological Institute, 1998, 469-488.

Feng X, Yu L, Kong W, et al. (2024). Frontier hotspots and trend evolution of cultural and creative design in China—an empirical research on CNKI-based bibliometrics. Library Hi Tech, 42(1), 203-226.

Han Yacheng, Yu Zhefan, & Qiu Song. (2018). Return to nature—Research and application of tacit wisdom in creation design. Design, 08, 105-107.

Heskett, J. (2005). Design: A very short introduction. New York: Oxford University Press. P. 3.

Hua, G, Gao, T, Zhang, X, et al. (2023). All Things Coexist Without Harming Each Other—A Growing Research in Multi-species Intelligent Design. International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. Pp. 68-77.

Krippendorff, K. (2005). The semantic turn: A new foundation for design. London & New York: CRC Press. P. 3.

Kuhn, T S, Jin Wulun, & Hu Xinhe. (trans) (2003). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. P. 78.

Leonard, D, & Rayport, J F. (1997). Spark innovation through empathic design. Harvard Business Review, 75, 102-115.

Lou Yongqi. (2017). New Environment Design in the Era of Global Knowledge Network. Journal of Nanjing University of the Arts (Fine Arts and Design), 01, 9-15+238.

Lukić B, Kātz B, Jiangxiao (Trans). (2012). Nonobject design. Beijing: Qinghua University of Press. P. 2.

Mattelmäki T, Vaajakallio K, & Koskinen I. (2014). What happened to empathic design? Design Issues, 30(1), 67-77.

Miriam Pastor. (2018 Jan 12). Designing for the forgotten [EB/OL]. https://medium.com/designit-global/designing-for-the-forgotten-b976509cad1b.

Norman, D A, & Stappers, P J. (2015). DesignX: complex sociotechnical systems. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 1(2), 83-106.

Rittel, H W J, & Webber, M M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155-169.

Rösch, N, Tiberius, V, & Kraus, S. (2023). Design thinking for innovation: context factors, process, and outcomes. European Journal of Innovation Management, 26(7), 160-176.

Scott, J C, & Wang, XY. (Trans). (2019). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. Beijing: Social Science Academic Press. Pp. 454-64.

Tironi, M, et al., eds. (2023). Design for more-than-human futures: Towards Post-Anthropocentric Worlding. Taylor & Francis, 2023.

Verganti, R, & Dai, S. (Trans). (2014). Design driven innovation: changing the rules of competition by radically innovating what things mean. Beijing: Renmin University of China Press. P. 71.

Wakkary R. (2021). Things we could design: For more than human-centered worlds. Massachusetts: MIT Press. Pp. 1-2.

How to cite this paper

The Design Philosophy of Symbiosis of All Things: Cross-border Experimental Creation and Reflection on Contemporary Ceramics

How to cite this paper: Guanqing Hua, Ling Zheng. (2024) The Design Philosophy of Symbiosis of All Things: Cross-border Experimental Creation and Reflection on Contemporary Ceramics. Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Science8(10), 2363-2367.

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.26855/jhass.2024.10.020