References
Bryman, A. (2003). Quantity and quality in social research (Vol. 18). Routledge.
Burgess, R. G. (Ed.). (2003). Field research: A sourcebook and field manual (Vol. 4). Routledge.
Foster, N. F., & Gibbons, S. L. (Eds.). (2007). Studying students: The undergraduate research project at the University of Rochester. Assoc of Cllge & Rsrch Libr.
Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity. University of California.
Goffman, E. (2016). The presentation of self in everyday life. In Social theory re-wired (pp. 482-493). Routledge.
Gui, L. M. (2015). Understanding Users: Study on the Application of Ethnographic Methods in Library and Information Science. Library and Information Service, 59(6), 16.
Gui, L. M. (2017). Study on the Needs of Library Users with the Ethnographic Method: A Project on Investigating the Process of Completing Course Paper of Shanghai University Freshmen. Library Journal, 36(7), 52-59.
Habermas, J. (2015). Knowledge and human interests. John Wiley & Sons.
Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2019). Ethnography: Principles in practice. Routledge.
Hsiang, J. (2016). Digital humanities: between past, present, and future. Taipei: National Taiwan University Publishing Center.
Hu, Y. (1996). Qualitative research: theories, methods and examples of local women's studies. Taipei: Chuliu.
Huang, C. Y. (1998). On Chicago School of Thought. Library, (2), 9-12.
Khoo, M., Rozaklis, L., & Hall, C. (2012). A survey of the use of ethnographic methods in the study of libraries and library users. Library & information science research, 34(2), 82-91.
Kuper, A., & Kuper, J. (2000). The Encyclopedia of Social Sciences. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Li, L. H. (2008). The Research Method of Library Science: Its Difficulties and Outlet. Library and information service, (8), 66.
McLaughlin, E. (1991). Oppositional poverty: The quantitative/qualitative divide and other dichotomies. The Sociological Review, 39(2), 292-308.
Merton, R. K. (1972). Insiders and outsiders: A chapter in the sociology of knowledge. American journal of sociology, 78(1), 9-47.
Miller, W. L., & Crabtree, B. F. (1992). Primary care research: A multimethod typology and qualitative road map.
Nardi, B. A., O'Day, V., & O'Day, V. L. (1999). Information ecologies: Using technology with heart. MIT Press.
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. SAGE Publications, inc.
Qiu, W. F. (2008). Positivistic Researches Should be Promoted in Library Science in China. Journal of Library Science in China, (1), 16-21.
Seadle, M. (1998). The raw and the cooked among librarians. Library Hi Tech, 16(3-1), 7-11.
Wang, Z. Q. (2017). Research on Library Users' Information Behavior Based on the Ethnographic Method. Journal of Academic Library and Information Science, 35(1), 41-44.
Wang, Z. Z. (2003). Subject nature of Library Science. Researches In Library Science, (1), 5-10.
Ye, Y. (2017). A Brief Review on the Research Trend of Library Science in China since 2000. Library Journal, 36(7), 4-9.
Zeng, L., Zhang, J., Yang, Z. Y. (2000). Digital Libraries: Where to go? Analysis of the definitions, architectures, and projects of digital libraries. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 19(1), 64-73.