References
Aktan S. Waking up to the dawn of a new era: Reconceptualization of curriculum post Covid-19 [J]. Prospects, 2021, 51(1): 205-217.
Apple M W. Teachers and texts: A political economy of class and gender relations in education [M]. Routledge, 2021.
Aronowitz S. Postmodern education: Politics, culture, and social criticism [M]. U of Minnesota Press, 1991.
Beane J A, Toepfer C F, Alessi S J. Curriculum planning and development [J]. (No Title), 1986.
Burns J P. The Tyler rationale: A reappraisal and rereading [J]. Prospects, 2023: 1-15.
Chen C, Chen Y, Cheng K. A study on comparing the objective model in curriculum planning between Taiwan and America [J]. 1996.
Coşkun Yaşar G, Aslan B. Curriculum theory: A review study [J]. International Journal of Curriculum and Instructional Studies (IJOCIS), 2021, 11(2).
Dhanapala, R. M. (2021). Triangular framework for curriculum development in the education sector.
Dillon J T. The questions of curriculum [J]. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 2009, 41(3): 343-359.
Eisner E W. Instructional and expressive educational objectives: Their formulation and use in curriculum. 1967.
https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED028838.
Giroux H A. Teachers, public life, and curriculum reform [J]. Peabody Journal of Education, 1994, 69(3): 35-47.
Hersh R H, Cohen S J. A Case against a case against behavioral objectives [J]. The Elementary School Journal, 1971, 71(8): 430-437.
Hlebowitsh P S. Interpretations of the Tyler Rationale: A reply to Kliebard [J]. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 1995, 27(1): 89-94.
Huang J R. Ralph W. Tyler Model criticism, clarification and suggestions. Curriculum and Teaching. 2005, 8(3): 91-104. DOI: 10.6384/CIQ.200507.0091.
Hyman R T. Means-ends reasoning and the curriculum [J]. Teachers College Record, 1972, 73(3): 393-401.
Joseph O O. A review: Models of curriculum evaluation. Department of Education Foundation Faculty of Education School of Post Graduate Studies Federal University, Dutsin-Ma Katsina State, 2021.
Kliebard H M. Persistent curriculum issues in historical perspective [J]. Curriculum theorizing: The Reconceptualists, 1975: 39-50.
Ornstein A C, Hunkins F P. Curriculum: Foundations, principles, and issues [M]. Pearson Higher Ed, 2017.
Pinar W F, Bowers C A. Chapter 4: politics of curriculum: origins, controversies, and significance of critical perspectives [J]. Review of Research in Education, 1992, 18(1): 163-190.
Slattery P. Curriculum Development in the Postmodern Era. Garland Reference Library of Social Science, Volume 929. Critical Education Practice, Volume 1 [M]. Garland Publishing, 1000A Sherman Avenue, Hamden, CT 06415, 1995.
Stufflebeam, Daniel L., George F. Madaus, and Thomas Kellaghan, eds. Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation. Vol. 49. Springer Science & Business Media, 2000.
Tyler R W. Basic principles of curriculum and instruction [M]//Curriculum studies reader E2. Routledge, 2013: 60-68.
Vo T K A. Evaluation models in educational program: Strengths and weaknesses [J]. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 2018, 34(2).
Wraga W G. Understanding the Tyler rationale: Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction in historical contex [J]. Espacio, Tiempo y Educación, 2017, 4(2): 227-252.