magazinelogo

Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Science

ISSN Online: 2576-0548 ISSN Print: 2576-0556 CODEN: JHASAY
Frequency: monthly Email: jhass@hillpublisher.com
Total View: 6569280 Downloads: 1928342 Citations: 437 (From Dimensions)
ArticleOpen Access http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/jhass.2024.02.025

Abuse and Regulation of the Jurisdiction Objection System in Civil Litigation

Jiayuan Lei1,*, Zhe Xing2, Zhuoru Han3

1Dalian Ocean University, Dalian, Liaoning, China.

2Shanxi Linghan Law Firm, Shanxi, China.

3Shanxi Police College, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.

*Corresponding author: Jiayuan Lei

Published: March 28, 2024

Abstract

The system of jurisdictional objection in civil litigation plays a positive role in protecting the litigation rights of the parties and promoting the fairness of case procedures and substantive justice. In recent years, the number of jurisdictional objection cases has remained high, with objection reasons becoming even more chaotic. The jurisdictional objection system has deviated from its original design and has been seriously abused. The jurisprudential basis for the abuse of the system of jurisdictional objections lies in the balance of fairness and efficiency, the right to sue, the right to a trial, and the absence of procedural sanctions. Therefore, in cases of jurisdictional objections, the threshold for initiating the objection procedure should be heightened, the trial procedure should be enhanced, and a mechanism for imposing penalties should be established. These measures aim to regulate the misuse of jurisdictional objections, promote procedural justice, and ensure substantive justice in the case.

Keyword

Civil suit, Jurisdiction Objection, Abuse, Regulation

References

Duan Wenbo. Reflection and Amendment of Civil Jurisdiction Review Procedure in China [J]. Chinese Law, 2019(04):186-206.

Jiang Wei. Civil Procedure Law, Higher Education Press, 2013, p. 163.

Jiang Wei. Repeat jurisdictional objection: premise assumption and internal mechanism [J]. Journal of Lanzhou University (Social Science Edition), 2019, 47(04):140-148.

Martin. On the reasonable regulation of abuse of jurisdiction remedy [J]. Research on Modernization of Rule of Law, 2021, 5 (06): 168-183.

Qiao Bo. On the legislative value of the Tort Liability Code of the Civil Code [J]. Social Sciences in Henan Province, 2020, 28 (12): 63-70.

Zhang Weiping. Jurisdiction objection: return to the origin and institutional amendment [J]. Law Studies, 2006 (04): 141-149.

Zhou Shuwan. Abuse and regulation of jurisdictional objections in civil proceedings [J]. Journal of Hebei North University (Social Science Edition), 2020, 36 (02): 58-63 + 84.

Copyright

© 2024 by the author(s).
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) license, which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not modified or adapted.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this paper

Abuse and Regulation of the Jurisdiction Objection System in Civil Litigation

How to cite this paper: Jiayuan Lei, Zhe Xing, Zhuoru Han. (2024) Abuse and Regulation of the Jurisdiction Objection System in Civil Litigation. Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Science8(2), 452-456.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/jhass.2024.02.025