ArticleOpen Access http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/jhass.2023.11.025
Performance Evaluation of Special Fund for Chinese Private Education: Logic and Index System
Jing Chen, Jiawen Fan, Deming Li*
School of Education, Jilin International Studies University, Changchun, Jilin, China.
*Corresponding author: Deming Li
Published: December 25,2023
Abstract
Assessing fiscal expenditure performance is a crucial tool for enhancing the Chinese government's credibility and effectiveness, ultimately improving its governance capacity. The evaluation of the performance of private education financial funds is beneficial for enhancing the vitality of private education, standardizing conduct, improving the quality of private schools, and fostering the establishment of a long-term mechanism for financial support to private education. The People's Congress, finance department, education department, and educational institutions are the entities being evaluated. Based on the logical framework and the "4Es" (Effectiveness, Efficiency, Economy, and Equity), the performance evaluation structure consists of three levels: macro policy performance, intermediate supervision performance, and micro utilization performance. In accordance with the principles of relevance and guidance, outcome-oriented and process control, quantitative and qualitative measures, and adequacy and feasibility, a performance evaluation index system suitable for the special fund for private education is established. The data structure needs to be strengthened to ensure accurate performance evaluation.
Keywords
Private education, special financial funds, performance evaluation
References
Arash Nemat, Nahid Raufi, Mohammad Yasir Essar, & Qingchun Zeng. (2021). A Survey on the Health and Financial Status of Private Educational Institutions in Afghanistan During COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 14, 1683-1689, DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S319872.
Barkin, J. (2006). International Organization: Theories and Institutions. Springer.
Dill, D. D. (1997). Higher education markets and public policy. Higher Education Policy, 10 (3-4), 167-185.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0952-8733(97)00011-1.
Fanghui Zheng & Guoge Liu. (2020). On the Structural System of Performance Evaluation of Financial Expenditure. Chinese Public Administration, (07), 41-48. doi:10.19735/j.issn.1006-0863.2020.07.06.
Frølich, N. (2011). Multi‐layered accountability. Performance‐based funding of universities. Public Administration, 89 (3), 840-859. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01867.x.
Hicks, D. (2012). Performance-based university research funding systems. Research Policy, 41(2), 251-261.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol. 2011.09.007.
Thomas, V., & Luo, X. (2012). Multilateral Banks and the Development Process: vital links in the results chain. Taylor & Francis.
Xiaojian Qiu. (2010). Relevant Theories of Government Financial Granting Non-governmental Higher Education and Their Interpretation. Research in Educational Development, 20, 40-45. doi:10.14121/j.cnki.1008-3855. 2010.20.018.
Zhigang, Zhu. (2003). Study on performance evaluation of fiscal expenditure. Beijing: China Finance and Economics Publishing House.
How to cite this paper
Performance Evaluation of Special Fund for Chinese Private Education: Logic and Index System
How to cite this paper: Jing Chen, Jiawen Fan, Deming Li. (2023) Performance Evaluation of Special Fund for Chinese Private Education: Logic and Index System. Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Science, 7(11), 2284-2290.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/jhass.2023.11.025