Abstract
As the primary school of social stratification theory, it laid the groundwork for the development of social stratification theory. Adhering to an objective and neutral position, Weber studied social stratification within the framework of static social relations, using the market as a foundation. He proposed using wealth, prestige, and power as the multiple criteria for social stratification. Weber developed a three-tiered system of social stratification to uphold capitalist dominance and facilitate the smooth operation and balanced growth of capitalist society by addressing social problems. These items are often simplified to the synonymous criteria of wealth, prestige, and power. This idea has much broader implications. Therefore, it is essential to conduct a thorough exploration to analyze contemporary social stratification and to promote the development of the market economy and the orderly participation of citizens in political life. Overall, the Weberian distinction between class and status is extremely useful. Weber's theory complements Marx's class theory by addressing dimensions that were previously missing.
References
Chan, T.W., & Goldthorpe, J.H. (2007). Class and status: The conceptual distinction and its empirical relevance. Ameri-can Sociological Review, 72 (4), pp. 512-532.
Crompton, R. (1989). Class theory and gender. British Journal of Sociology, pp. 565-587.
Crompton, R. (2010). Class and employment. Work, Employment and Society, 24 (1), pp. 9-26.
Gane, N. (2005). Max Weber as social theorist: ‘Class, status, party’. European Journal of Social Theory, 8 (2), pp. 211-226.
Giddens, A. (1998). Marx and Weber: Problems of class structure. RF Levine, social class and stratification--classic statements and theoretical debates, pp. 114-118.
Goffman, E. (1951). Symbols of class status. The British Journal of Sociology, 2 (4), pp. 294-304.
Hertel, F. R., & Groh-Samberg, O. (2019). The relation between inequality and intergenerational class mobility in 39 countries. American Sociological Review, 84 (6), 1099-1133. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122419885094.
Schulz, C.-A. (2019). Hierarchy salience and social action: disentangling class, status, and authority in world politics. International relations, 33 (1), 88-108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117818803434.
Scott, J. (1994). Class analysis: Back to the future. Sociology, 28 (4), pp. 933-942.
Scott, J. (2014). Stratification and power: Structures of Class, Status and Command. John Wiley & Sons.
Weber, M., & Roth, G. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. University of California Press.
Wright, E.O. (2002). The shadow of exploitation in Weber’s class analysis. American Sociological Review, pp. 832-853.