magazinelogo

Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Science

ISSN Print: 2576-0556 Downloads: 352662 Total View: 2975833
Frequency: monthly ISSN Online: 2576-0548 CODEN: JHASAY
Email: jhass@hillpublisher.com
Article http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/jhass.2023.09.026

The Influence of Medieval Byzantine Culture on “Umayyad Mosaics”

Jingyi Wan1,*, Mingyu Jiang2

1The Experimental High School Attached to Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.

2Jilin International Studies University, Changchun, Jilin, China.

*Corresponding author: Jingyi Wan

Published: October 25,2023

Abstract

Among the wonders of the Dome of the Rock, Jerusalem, the Umayyad mosaics have attracted historians for their gorgeous appearance and rich cultural connotations. By referring to the Umayyad mosaics on the octagonal arcades of the dome, this paper explores the cultural interaction between the medieval Christian (Byzantine) civilization and the Islamic civilization in the framework of the “cultural representation” theory and the “signifying practices” theory proposed by Stuart Hall in 1997. As the dome’s initial ornaments, the Umayyad mosaic patterns and inscriptions correspond to the political means of Caliph Abd Al-Malik, the funder of the dome’s construction, whose intentions reflect the medieval historical background. In addition, the production regulations and artistic practices of the Umayyad mosaic inscriptions have portrayed the medieval contextual influences on art and art activities. This paper analyzes the symbolic meanings behind the mosaic patterns based on the “Cultural Representation” theory, which is defined as the process by which meaning is produced and exchanged between members of a culture through the use of signs and images. Moreover, through the framework of Hall’s “Signifying Practices” theory, this paper explores how craftsmen construct the mosaic walls following particular rules and regulations, which also reflect the overall environment of cultural interaction.

References

Conor Whately. A Companion to the Byzantine Culture of War, ca.300–1204, ed. Yannis Stouraitis [J]. The English Historical Review, 2020, p. 20.

Encyclopaedia of Islam, Official Website. “Dome of the Rock” [Z]. Accessed April 2014.

George, Alain. "Paradise or empire?: On a paradox of Umayyad art." [C]. Power, Patronage and Memory in Early Islam: Perspectives on Umayyad Elites, Oxford University Press, 2018.

Grabar, Oleg. The Umayyad Dome of the Rock in Jerusalem [J]. Art Orientalism Vol. 3, 1959, Pp. 33-62. 

John A. Cotsonis. The Religious Figural Imagery of Byzantine Lead Seals II [M]. Taylor and Francis: 2020-04-16.

Kaldellis Anthony. Greek Epigram and Byzantine Culture: Gender, Desire, and Denial in the Age of Justinian [J]. Classical Philology, 2020,115(3).

Milwright Marcus. The Dome of the Rock and its Umayyad Mosaic Inscriptions [M]. Edinburgh University Press: 2016-03-08.

Milwright, Marcus. The Dome of the Rock and its Umayyad Mosaic Inscriptions [M], 2016.

Olaru C.G.. Ideology, symbolism and representation through Byzantine art [J]. Anastasis, 2018, p. 12.

Vasileios M. On earth as it is in heaven? Reinterpreting the Heavenly Liturgy in Byzantine art [J]. Byzantinische Zeitschrift, 2021, p. 18.

How to cite this paper

The Influence of Medieval Byzantine Culture on "Umayyad Mosaics"

How to cite this paper: Jingyi Wan, Mingyu Jiang. (2023) The Influence of Medieval Byzantine Culture on "Umayyad Mosaics". Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Science7(9), 1841-1845.

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.26855/jhass.2023.09.026