Abstract
Based on the core paper database of Web of Science, and with the help of CiteSpace visualization tool, this paper conducts a dynamic econometric analysis on the hot topics and trends of international research carried out using the discourse-historical approach as a theoretical framework in the past ten years. The results show that: 1) From the published papers, in terms of total volume, English-speaking countries still adopt the discourse-historical approach as an important center for theoretical framework research, while the number of papers published in Asia has increased rapidly in recent years; 2) The topics with more articles and citations are mainly focused on the study of political event discourse, theoretical strategies, nationalist discourse, and identity construction discourse in European countries; 3) Research frontiers are closely related to hot topics, and research on political event discourse research and nationalist discourse research are still important topics; 4) Non-English-speaking countries will become the most important countries for discourse research using discourse-historical approach in the future.
References
Foucault, M., & Gordon, C. (2015). Power/Knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972-1977.
New York: Vintage Books.
Ghaffari, S. (2019). Religious discursive practices and identity in Iran: New trends in religious ritual performances among the youth. Critical Discourse Studies, 17(5), 527-544.
Li, J., Chen, C.M. (2017). CiteSpace: Science and Technology Text Mining and Visualization (Second Edition). Capital University of Economics and Business Press, Beijing.
Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. E. (2015). The discourse-historical approach (DHA). In R. Wodak, & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse studies (3rd ed., pp. 87-121). London: Sage.
Shi Xingsong, Cheng Xia. (2021). Corpus-Based Research on Corporate Identity Discourse of Chinese and American Banks [J]. Modern Foreign Languages, (2): 170-182.
Viola, L., & Verheul, J. (2019). Mining ethnicity: Discourse-driven topic modelling of immigrant discourses in the USA, 1898–1920. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 35(4), 921-943.
Weber, M. (2003). Weber: Political Writings (Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought) (P. Lassman, Ed.; R. Speirs, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wodak, R. (2001). The discourse-historical approach. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, 63-94. London: Sage.
Wodak, R. (2007). Language and ideology — language in ideology. Journal of Language and Politics, 6(1), 1-5.
Wodak, R., & Fairclough, N. (2010). Recontextualizing European Higher Education Policies: The cases of Austria and Romania. Critical Discourse Studies, 7(1), 19-40.
Wodak, R., & Reisigl, M. (2015). Discourse and racism. The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, 576-596.
How to cite this paper
A Mapping-knowledge-domain Analysis of International Advances in Discourse-historical Approach (2010-2022)
How to cite this paper: Jiaxin Lv. (2023). A Mapping-knowledge-domain Analysis of International Advances in Discourse-historical Approach (2010-2022). The Educational Review, USA, 7(6), 828-832.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/er.2023.06.036