magazinelogo

The Educational Review, USA

ISSN Online: 2575-7946 ISSN Print: 2575-7938 CODEN: TERUBB
Frequency: monthly Email: edu@hillpublisher.com
Total View: 6804886 Downloads: 1418482 Citations: 1026 (From Dimensions)
OpenAlex-based citation data
  • citations

    1417
  • h-index

    13
  • i10-index

    14
ArticleOpen Access http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/er.2023.02.006

Rhetorical Appeals Used in Shakespearean Soliloquies of Hamlet, Macbeth, and Othello

Faiza Altaf1, Muhammad Arfan Lodhi2,*

1Govt. Sadiq College Women University, Bahawalpur, Pakistan.

2Higher Education Department (Collegiate Wing), Punjab, Pakistan.

*Corresponding author: Muhammad Arfan Lodh

Published: March 20, 2023

Abstract

In this article, the authors have focused on the rhetorical/ persuasive devices specifically introduced by Aristotle. The rhetorical devices framework has been used on the selected works of Shakespearean tragedies. Shakespeare is well-known for using rhetorical appeals in his plays. He has used these devices to enhance the verbal expression. He convinced the readers silently to imagine the setting of the play in which characters are fixed. He has used these devices that appeal to emotions, values and ideals. This paper specifically analyzes the soliloquies used in the Shakespearean tragedies Hamlet, Othello, and Macbeth. The exploratory research is used by the researcher to highlight the impact of the language used to provoke the emotions of the reader. The selected lines of different soliloquies of the afore-stated tragedies were taken as sample for the analysis purposes. The findings revealed that all rhetoric devices i.e. ethos, pathos, kairos, logos and telos had been used by the playwright with more or less frequency. The findings further highlighted that use of rhetorical devices cast significant impact upon the reader’s mind, emotions and sense of feelings when they read the text of Shakespearean plays.

Keyword

Rhetorical appeals, Ethos, Pathos, Kairos, Logos, Telos

References

Abioye, T. (2011). Preference for Rhetorical Questions as an Index of Textual Message Effectiveness. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(11), 290-299.

Aristotle. (1984). ‘Rhetoric’, in J. Barnes (ed.) The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation, volume LXXI, tome I of Bollingen Series. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.

Badawi, M. M. (1981). Background to Shakespeare. London: Macmillan.

Barley, S. R. (1983). Semiotics and the study of occupational and organizational cultures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(3), 393-413.

Barley, S. R. and Kunda, G. (1992). Design and devotion: Surges of rational and normative ideologies of control in managerial discourse. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(3), 363-399. 

Brémond, C., Le Goff, J., and Schmitt, J.-C. (1982). L’Exemplum, volume 40 of Typologie des Sources du Moyen Age Occidental. Turnhout: Brepols.

Campbell and Huxman. (2009).The rhetorical act.Thinking, speaking and writing critically (4th Edition). Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

Charteris-Black. (2005). Politicians and rhetoric: the persuasive power of Metaphor. Palgrave, Macmillan.

Dickson-La Prade, D. (2020). “Analyzing Ethos and Pathos”.

Douglas, S. V., et al. (2001). Spectrum Writing, Grade 8. Ohio: McGraw-Hill Children's Pub.

Greenblatt, Stephen. “General Introduction.” The Norton Shakespeare: Volume I. 2nd ed. Greenblatt, Cohen, Howard & Maus. New York City: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc., 2008. 1-78. Print.

Holt, R. (2006). Principles and practice: Rhetoric and the moral character of managers. Human Relations, 59(12), 1659-1680.

Magsumov, Ta. (2019). “Apprenticeship in secondary vocational schools during the economic modernization in late imperial Russia”. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 8(1), pp. 215-221. 

Mahao, M. (2002). "Shakespeare towards the End o f the Road?" Johannesburg: Unpublished M.A. Thesis.

Manzin, M. and Tomasi, S (2014). “Ethos and pathos in legal argumentation.8th International Conference on Argumentation”. Pp. 930-941. Netherlands: University of Amsterdam.

Murcia, S. and O’ Donnell M. (2011). Language and power in English texts. Course material developed for a PhD program at the Universidad Autonomade Madrid. Retrieved from 

http://web.uam.es/departmentos/filoyeletras/filoinglesa/Courses/LFCSFL/PowerDoctoradoV9-readingsweek2.pdf.

(accessed14/9/2022).

Rocklin, Edward L. Performance Approaches to Teaching Shakespeare. Urbana, Ill: National Council of Teachers of English, 2005. Print.

Rohde, H. (2006). Rhetorical questions as redundant interrogatives. Department of Linguistics, UCSD.

Weib, J. and Schwietring, T. (2015). The power of language: A philosophical- sociological reflection. Retrieved from 

www.goethe.de/lhr/prj/mac/msp/en1253450.htm on 14/9/2021.

Copyright

© 2023 by the author(s).
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) license, which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not modified or adapted.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this paper

Rhetorical Appeals Used in Shakespearean Soliloquies of Hamlet, Macbeth, and Othello

How to cite this paper: Faiza Altaf, Muhammad Arfan Lodhi. (2023). Rhetorical Appeals Used in Shakespearean Soliloquies of Hamlet, Macbeth, and OthelloThe Educational Review, USA7(2), 161-171.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/er.2023.02.006