Advance in Biological Research

Downloads: 8311 Total View: 119896
Frequency: Instant publication ISSN Online: 2635-0319 CODEN: ABRDF6
Email: abr@hillpublish.com

Volumes & Issues

Current Issue

Article http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/abr.2022.12.002

Analysis on Evaluation and Influencing Factors of Knowledge Exchange Efficiency in Life Science Journals under the Background of High Quality Development

Juan Yin

1Hill Publishing Group, USA.

2Damray Culture Communication Co., Ltd., China.

*Corresponding author: Juan Yin

Published: December 22,2022

Abstract

Objective/Significance: Life science and biotechnology is one of the most important, rapidly developing and comprehensive interdisciplinary disciplines since the new century, and is also the focus of global science and technology competition. It has become an important supporting means for scientific decision-making of scientific research management institutions to keep abreast of the latest developments in the field of life science, such as frontier development level and research hotspot, and accurately grasp the research advantages, research trends and main contributions of domestic scientists. The study on the efficiency of knowledge exchange and its influencing factors is of great significance to the high quality development of life science journals. Method/Process: Taking 18 life science journals from 2016 to 2021 as the research object, this paper used SBM model and Malmquist index model to conduct static and dynamic analysis on the efficiency of knowledge exchange of journals, and combined with Tobit model to analyze the influencing factors of knowledge exchange efficiency. Result/Conclusion: The study found that the overall knowledge exchange efficiency of life science journals was low, and there was still a lack of pure technical efficiency and scale efficiency. The academic quality of journals, publication cycle, publication time and new media integration of journals passed the significance test, which had a significant impact on the knowledge exchange efficiency. The aging speed of journals has no significant effect on the efficiency of knowledge exchange.

References

[1] Vaccario G, Tomasello M V, Tessone C J, et al. Quantifying knowledge exchange in R&D networks: a data-driven model [J]. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 2018, 21(3): 182-185.

[2] Peng H, Qu H, Li P. Study on the knowledge dissemination efficiency and influence factors of electronic technology journals community based on the DEA-Tobit method [J]. Journal of Physics Conference Series, 2020, 32(4): 2016-2022.

[3] Smatt C T, Wasko M, Hawamdeh S. The Paradox of Knowledge Networks: Why More Knowledge Does Not Always Make You More Successful [J]. Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, 2022, 15(2): 621-627.

[4] Du H. A Study on Knowledge Exchange of International Library and Information Science Based on the Perspective of Journal Citation [J]. Library Science Research & Work, 2019, 42(12): 97-104.

[5] Hong-Jiang L V, Cheng M, Li-Hua W U. An influence of the matching between the breadth and the depth knowledge exchange on the knowledge networks efficiency: the analysis based on the whole structure characteristics of knowledge network [J]. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2018, 31(11): 263-268.

[6] Yang R, Quan M, Wu Y. Research on Knowledge Exchange Efficiency of Scientific Researchers in Academic Virtual Community [J]. Library & Information, 2018, 41(10): 835-839.

[7] Suping M A, Chen D, Hanqing M A, et al. A new academic exchange mode of scientific journals: online seminar [J]. Acta Editologica, 2019, 26(9): 64-68.

[8] Barczak G. A Bibliometric Analysis of the Knowledge Exchange Patterns Between Major Technology and Innovation Management Journals (1999-2013) Commentary [J]. Journal of product innovation management, 2018, 35(1): 69-72.

[9] Castello S, Darker C, Vance J, et al. The knowledge exchange and dissemination plan of the We Can Quit2 community-based stop-smoking trial [J]. European Journal of Public Health, 2021, 41(8): 567-572.

[10] Pego Y T, Varela L, Mazaira-Castro J, et al. PP125 PhotoVoice: Promoting Knowledge Exchange About Patients' Experiences [J]. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2019, 35(11): 60-66.

[11] Van D, Francis O, Doe E, et al. Structural approaches to knowledge exchange: comparing practices across five centres of excellence in public health [J]. Journal of Public Health, 2018, 17(1): 31-38.

[12] Casey E. Inter-regional digital forensic knowledge management: needs, challenges, and solutions [J]. Journal of forensic sciences, 2021, 66(2): 96-98.

[13] Gstttner C, Vergoossen D, Wuhrer M, et al. Sheathless CE-MS as a tool for monitoring exchange efficiency and stability of bispecific antibodies [J]. ELECTROPHORESIS, 2020, 25(11): 528-534.

[14] Evangelos D. Leonardos, Xiao Ma, Jason Lanoue, Bernard Grodzinski. Leaf and whole-plant gas exchange and water-use efficiency of chrysanthemums under HPS and LEDs during the vegetative and flower-induction stages [J]. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 2019, 99(5): 216-219.

[15] Rabello R, Frhlich M, Maffiuletti N A, et al. Influence of Pulse Waveform and Frequency on Evoked Torque, Stimulation Efficiency and Discomfort in Healthy Subjects [J]. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 2020, 32(6): 126-131.

[16] Xing Y, Geng K, Chu X, et al. Chemically stable anion exchange membranes based on C2-Protected imidazolium cations for vanadium flow battery [J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2020, 61(5): 696-673.

How to cite this paper

Analysis on Evaluation and Influencing Factors of Knowledge Exchange Efficiency in Life Science Journals under the Background of High Quality Development

How to cite this paper: Juan Yin. (2022) Analysis on Evaluation and Influencing Factors of Knowledge Exchange Efficiency in Life Science Journals under the Background of High Quality Development. Advance in Biological Research3(1), 77-84.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/abr.2022.12.002