The Educational Review, USA

ISSN Print: 2575-7938 Downloads: 217843 Total View: 3140064
Frequency: monthly ISSN Online: 2575-7946 CODEN: TERUBB

A Brief Review of Washback Studies in the South Asian Countries

Nasreen Sultana

Faculty of Education, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada

*Corresponding author: Nasreen Sultana, PhD Candidate, Faculty of Education

Published: September 18,2018


Influence of tests on teaching and learning, which is known as washback, has garnered attention among the researchers and scholars because of the ever-growing testing in-dustry worldwide. Scores of the high stakes language tests are increasingly used as the gatekeeper to higher education, better employment or immigration to a different coun-try. Acknowledging the importance of studying the influence of test, several washback studies have been conducted in the past 20 years targeting various aspects of how tests influence teaching and learning. However, washback research lacks critical input from the extreme test-oriented South Asian countries (Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka), where tests have an immense influ-ence on all levels of stakeholders. Therefore, this paper systematically reviews the lim-ited studies conducted in this region to explore the nature of washback in its local con-texts as well as to reveal the research gaps for future washback researchers.


 Adnan, U., & Mahmood, A. M. (2014). Impact of Public Examination on Teaching of English: AWashback Perspective. Journal of Educa-tion and Practice, 5(2), 132-139.

Aftab, A., Qureshi, S., & William, I. (2014). Investigating the Washback Effect of the PakistaniIntermediate English Examination. Interna-tional Journal of English and Literature, 5(7),149-154.

Ahmad,  K.,  Ghani,  M.,  Alam, M.,  &  Sadiq, M. (2012).  Washback  Effects  on  English  LanguageTeachers. International  Researchers,1(3),182-190.

Ahmad,  S.,  &  Rao,  C. (2012).  Examination Washback Effect: Syllabus, Teaching Methodology  andthe Learners' Communicative Compe-tence.Journal of Education and Practice, 3(15),173-83.

Alderson, J.C., & Wall, D. (1993). Does Washback Exist?Applied Linguistics, 14(2), 115-129.

Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. (1996). Language Testing in Practice: Designing and Developing Useful Language Tests. Oxford: OUP.

Bailey, K. M. (1996). Working for Washback: A Review of the Washback Concept in LanguageTesting. Language Testing, 13(3), 257-279.

Beikmahdavi,  N.  (2016).  Washback  in  Language  Testing:  Review  of  Related  Literature  First.International  Journal  of  Modern  LanguageTeaching and Learning, 1(4), 130-136.

Biggs, J.B. (1993). Assumptions Underlying New Approaches to Assessment, Curriculum Forum,4, 1.

Cheng,  L.  (1997).  How Does Washback Influence Teaching?  Implications  for  Hong  Kong. Language  and Education, 11(1),  38-54.

Cheng, L. (2005). Changing Language Teaching through Language Testing: A Washback Study(Vol.21).Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Uni-versity Press.

Cheng, L. (2014). Consequences, Impact, and Washback. The Companion to LanguageAssessment. In A. J. Kunnan (Ed.), The Companion toLanguage Assessment(pp. 1-14).Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Cheng,  L.,  &  Curtis,  A.  (2004).  Washback  or  Backwash:  A  Review  of  the  Impact  of  Testing  onTeaching  and  Learning.  In  L.  Cheng, Y.Watanabe & A. Curtis (eds.), Washback inLanguage Testing: Research Contexts and Methods(pp. 3-18). Mahwah, NJ: LawrenceErlbaum Associates.

Cheng, L., Sun, Y., & Ma, J. (2015). Review of Washback Research Literature within Kane'sArgument-Based Validation Framework. Lan-guage Teaching, 48(04), 436-470.

Hoque,  M. E. (2011).  Washback  of  the  Public  Examination  on Teaching and  Learning  English asa  Foreign  Language  (EFL)  at the HigherSecondary Level in Bangladesh (Doctoraldissertation). Jahangir Nagar University, Savar, Bangladesh.

Hoque,  M.  E.  (2016).  Teaching  to  the  EFL Curriculum  or Teaching  to  the Test:  An Investigation.The  EDRC  Journal  of  Learning  andTeaching, 1(1), 6-30.

Hughes, A. (1989). Testing for Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Jilani, R. (2009). Problematizing High School Certificate Exam in Pakistan: A WashbackPerspective. The Reading Matrix, 9(2), 175-183.

Khaniya, T. R. (1990). The Washback Effect of a Textbook-Based Test. Edinburgh Working Papers in Applied Linguistics, 1,48-58.

Khitab, U., Ghaffar, A., Zaman, A., & Ali, R. (2016). To Investigate the Evidence of Positiveand Negative Wash Back at Secondary Level.Journal of Applied Environmental andBiological Sciences,6(1), 314-321.

Kirkpatrick, R., & Gyem, K. (2012). Washback Effects of the New English Assessment Systemon Secondary Schools in Bhutan. Language Testing in Asia, 2(4), 5.

Maniruzzaman, M. (2012). Relations of Washback to the Teachers of English as a ForeignLanguage at the SSC Level. Bangladesh Journal ofPublic Administration,XXI(II), 1-30.

Maniruzzaman, M. (2016). EFLTesting Washback: Assessment of Learning or Assessment forLearning? Center for Pedagogy (CP), Inde-pendent University, Bangladesh (IUB), 350-369.

Maniruzzaman, M., & Hoque, M. E. (2010). Washback of the Public Examination on Teachingand Learning English as a Foreign Language (EFL) at the Higher Secondary Level inBangladesh. Language in India,16(9), 49-87.

Mathew,  R.  (2012).  Understanding Washback:  A Case Study  of  a New Exam  in  India'.  In  C.Tribble  (Ed.), Managing Change  in  English Language Teaching: Lessons from Experience,(pp. 193-200). London, UK: British Council.

Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational Measurement3rd ed (pp. 13-103).New York, NY: ACE and Macmillan.

Pearson, I. (1988). Tests as Levers for Change. In D. Chamberlain & R. J. Baumgardner (Eds.), ESP in the Classroom: Practice and Evalua-tion.ELT Documents Volume 128(pp. 98-107). London: Modern English Publications.

Popham, W. J. (1987). The Merits of Measurement-Driven Instruction. Phi Delta Kappan, 68,679-682.

Shepard,  L.A.  (1990).  Inflated Test Score Gains:  Is  the Problem Old Norms  or Teaching  the Test? Educational  Measurement, 9, 15-22.

Shohamy,  E.  (1992).  Beyond Proficiency Testing:  A Diagnostic Feedback Testing Model  forAssessing Foreign Language Learning. TheModern Language Journal, 76(4), 513-521.

Shohamy,  E.,  Donitsa-Schmidt,  S.,  &  Ferman,  I.  (1996).  Test ImpactRevisited:  WashbackEffectOver Time. Language  Testing, 13(3),298-317.

Soomro,  A.  H.,  &  Shah,  S.  Z.  A.  (2016).  Effects  of  Washback  on  High  School  Teachers  of  English. International  Journal  of  English  andEducation, 5(2), 201-210.

Soomro,  M.  N.,  & Memon,  N. (2016).  Investigation  of  Teacher  as  an  Inducing  Factor  of Washback  in  Pakistan. Language in  India,16(5), 185-198.

Spolsky, B. (1994). The Examination of Classroom Backwash Cycle: Some Historical Cases. In D.Nunan,   V.   Berry,   &   R.   Berry   (Eds.),Bringing about Change in Language Education(pp.55-66). Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong, Department of Curriculum Studies.

Wei, W. (2017). A Critical Review of Washback Studies: Hypothesis and Evidence. In R., Al-Mahrooqi, C., Coombe, F., Al-Maamari & V.,Thakur (Eds.), Revisiting EFL Assessment(pp. 49-67). New York, NY: Springer.

How to cite this paper

A Brief Review of Washback Studies in the South Asian Countries

How to cite this paper: Sultana, N. (2018). A Brief Review of Washback Studies in the South Asian Countries. The Educational Review, USA, 2(9), 468-474.